Fredrik Engelstad

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2022). Makt i det norske samfunnet. I Frønes, Ivar & Kjølsrød, Lise (Red.), Det norske samfunn : bind 2. Gyldendal Akademisk. s. 341–364.
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens; Mangset, Marte & Teigen, Mari (2019). Elites and People: Challenges to Democracy. I Engelstad, Fredrik; Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens; Mangset, Marte & Teigen, Mari (Red.), Elites and people: Challenges to democracy. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. s. 1–13. doi: 10.1108/s0195-631020190000034001.
• Mangset, Marte; Engelstad, Fredrik; Teigen, Mari & Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens (2019). The Populist Elite Paradox: Using Elite Theory to Elucidate the Shapes and Stakes of Populist Elite Critiques. I Engelstad, Fredrik; Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens; Mangset, Marte & Teigen, Mari (Red.), Elites and people: Challenges to democracy. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. s. 203–222. doi: 10.1108/s0195-631020190000034010. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Larsen, Håkon (2019). Nordic civil spheres and pro-civil states. I Alexander, Jeffrey C.; Lund, Anna & Voyer, Andrea (Red.), The Nordic Civil Sphere. Polity Press. s. 39–63. Vis sammendrag

  The civil sphere is a distinctively democratic field in modern societies, one that sustains universalizing cultural aspirations and organizational structures and that has tense and uncertain boundaries with other spheres of social life, like the economy, religion, family, and state. Unlike the latter, which are more particularistic and hierarchical in character, the civil sphere defines itself in terms of solidarity – the feeling of being connected with every other person in the collectivity. The utopian ideals of democratic solidarity shape every modern society, even if they are often compromised by the messy realities of social life. This volume uses the theory of the civil sphere to shed new light on Nordic societies, while at the same time drawing on the distinctive experiences of the Nordic nations to reflect on and advance the theory of the civil sphere. Nordic societies have long been admired for creating a distinctive form of social democracy, but this admirable achievement has not been well conceptualized theoretically. Most attempts to explain Nordic social democracy focus on material and organizational factors. This volume, by contrast, emphasizes the cultural foundations and characteristics of social democracy, demonstrating how civil sensibilities are necessary for the creation of an egalitarian and democratic state. Nordic civil spheres, however, are not only pro-civil but also white in color, European in ethnicity, secular in character and gender-equal in a subtly restrictive manner. Such primordialization of state civility is vividly on display in the sometime tense relationships that develop among natives and “foreigners” in Nordic countries, relationships that expose the primordial undersides of the social democratic codes and civil values that constitute the Nordic civil sphere. A major contribution to the theory of the civil sphere and to our understanding of the cultural and normative underpinnings of social and political life, this volume will be of particular interest to students and scholars of sociology and politics.

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). Afterword: Institutional Differentiation and Change. I Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (Red.), Democratic State and Democratic Society. De Gruyter Open. s. 389–400. doi: 10.1515/9783110634082-019.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). Elite Compromise as a Mode of Institutional Change: The United States and Norway Compared. I Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (Red.), Democratic State and Democratic Society. De Gruyter Open. s. 363–388. doi: 10.1515/9783110634082-018.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). Social Institutions and the Quality of Democracy. I Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (Red.), Democratic State and Democratic Society. De Gruyter Open. s. 22–47. doi: 10.1515/9783110634082-003.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). CHEF/Chief. I Stene-Johansen, Knut; Refsum, Christian & Schimanski, Johan (Red.), Living Together – Roland Barthes, the Individual and the Community. Transcript Verlag. s. 125–134.
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Byrkjeflot, Haldor (2018). Introduction: Bureaucracy in transition. I Byrkjeflot, Haldor & Engelstad, Fredrik (Red.), Bureaucracy and Society in Transition: Comparative Perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. s. 1–11. doi: 10.1108/s0195-631020180000033005.
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (2018). Introduction: Democracy, Institutional Compatibility and Change. I Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (Red.), Democratic State and Democratic Society. De Gruyter Open. s. 1–21. doi: 10.1515/9783110634082-002.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). Models of elite integration. I Best, Heinrich & Higley, John (Red.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. Palgrave Macmillan. s. 439–457. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_28. Vis sammendrag

  In this chapter, elites are associated with the possession of decisive political power that gives them disproportionate influence on political and social outcomes. Two opposing views of elite power in democracies are found in the literature. One is of a coalescent power structure or “power elite” and the other is of a pluralistic power structure consisting of elite groups located in diverse economic, governmental, military, media, scientific, and other sectors. The accuracy of these two conflicting views of elite power is treated as an empirical question and takes the pluralist view as the point of departure without, however, ruling out the coalescent view.

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2017). Strategic Communication and Institutional Change. I Engelstad, Fredrik; Larsen, Håkon; Rogstad, Jon & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (Red.), Institutional Change in the Public Sphere: Views on the Nordic Model. De Gruyter Open. Vis sammendrag

  The main focus of the book is institutional change in the Scandinavian model, with special emphasis on Norway. There are many reasons to pay closer attention to the Norwegian case when it comes to analyses of changes in the public sphere. In the country’s political history, the arts and the media played a particular role in the processes towards sovereignty at the beginning of the 20th century. On a par with the other Scandinavian countries, Norway is in the forefront in the world in the distribution and uses of Internet technology. As an extreme case, the most corporatist society within the family of the “Nordic Model”, it offers an opportunity both for intriguing case studies and for challenging and refining existing theory on processes of institutional change in media policy and cultural policy. It supplements two recent, important books on political economy in Scandinavia: Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity (Kathleen Thelen, 2014), and The Political Construction of Business Interests (Cathie Jo Martin and Duane Swank, 2013). There are further reasons to pay particular attention to the Scandinavian, and more specifically the Norwegian cases: (i) They are to varying degrees neo-corporatist societies, characterized by ongoing bargaining over social and political reform processes. From a theoretical perspective this invites reflections which, to some extent, are at odds with the dominant conceptions of institutional change. Neither models of path dependency nor models of aggregate, incremental change focus on the continuous social bargaining over institutional change. (ii) Despite recent processes of liberalization, common to the Western world as a whole, corporatism implies a close connection between state, public sphere, cultural life, and religion. This also means that institutions are closely bundled, in an even stronger way than assumed for example in the Varieties of Capitalism literature. Furthermore, we only have scarce insight in the way the different spheres of corporatism are connected and interact. In the proposed edited volume we have collected historical-institutional case studies from a broad set of social fields (a detailed outline of contents and contributors is attached): • Critical assessments of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of the public sphere • Can the public sphere be considered an institution? • The central position of the public sphere in social and political change in Norway • Digital transformations and effects of the growing PR industry on the public sphere • Institutionalization of social media in local politics and voluntary organizations • Legitimation work in the public sphere • freedom of expression and warning in the workplace • “Return of religion” to the public sphere, and its effects.

• Engelstad, Fredrik; Larsen, Håkon; Rogstad, Jon & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (2017). Introduction: The Public Sphere in Change. Institutional Perspectives on Neo-corporatist Society. I Engelstad, Fredrik; Larsen, Håkon; Rogstad, Jon & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (Red.), Institutional Change in the Public Sphere: Views on the Nordic Model. De Gruyter Open. s. 1–21. doi: 10.1515/9783110546330-002. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  The main focus of the book is institutional change in the Scandinavian model, with special emphasis on Norway. There are many reasons to pay closer attention to the Norwegian case when it comes to analyses of changes in the public sphere. In the country’s political history, the arts and the media played a particular role in the processes towards sovereignty at the beginning of the 20th century. On a par with the other Scandinavian countries, Norway is in the forefront in the world in the distribution and uses of Internet technology. As an extreme case, the most corporatist society within the family of the “Nordic Model”, it offers an opportunity both for intriguing case studies and for challenging and refining existing theory on processes of institutional change in media policy and cultural policy. It supplements two recent, important books on political economy in Scandinavia: Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity (Kathleen Thelen, 2014), and The Political Construction of Business Interests (Cathie Jo Martin and Duane Swank, 2013). There are further reasons to pay particular attention to the Scandinavian, and more specifically the Norwegian cases: (i) They are to varying degrees neo-corporatist societies, characterized by ongoing bargaining over social and political reform processes. From a theoretical perspective this invites reflections which, to some extent, are at odds with the dominant conceptions of institutional change. Neither models of path dependency nor models of aggregate, incremental change focus on the continuous social bargaining over institutional change. (ii) Despite recent processes of liberalization, common to the Western world as a whole, corporatism implies a close connection between state, public sphere, cultural life, and religion. This also means that institutions are closely bundled, in an even stronger way than assumed for example in the Varieties of Capitalism literature. Furthermore, we only have scarce insight in the way the different spheres of corporatism are connected and interact. In the proposed edited volume we have collected historical-institutional case studies from a broad set of social fields (a detailed outline of contents and contributors is attached): • Critical assessments of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of the public sphere • Can the public sphere be considered an institution? • The central position of the public sphere in social and political change in Norway • Digital transformations and effects of the growing PR industry on the public sphere • Institutionalization of social media in local politics and voluntary organizations • Legitimation work in the public sphere • freedom of expression and warning in the workplace • “Return of religion” to the public sphere, and its effects.

• Engelstad, Fredrik; Larsen, Håkon & Rogstad, Jon (2017). The Public Sphere in the Nordic Model. I Engelstad, Fredrik; Larsen, Håkon; Rogstad, Jon & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (Red.), Institutional Change in the Public Sphere: Views on the Nordic Model. De Gruyter Open. s. 46–70. doi: 10.1515/9783110546330-004. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  The main focus of the book is institutional change in the Scandinavian model, with special emphasis on Norway. There are many reasons to pay closer attention to the Norwegian case when it comes to analyses of changes in the public sphere. In the country’s political history, the arts and the media played a particular role in the processes towards sovereignty at the beginning of the 20th century. On a par with the other Scandinavian countries, Norway is in the forefront in the world in the distribution and uses of Internet technology. As an extreme case, the most corporatist society within the family of the “Nordic Model”, it offers an opportunity both for intriguing case studies and for challenging and refining existing theory on processes of institutional change in media policy and cultural policy. It supplements two recent, important books on political economy in Scandinavia: Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity (Kathleen Thelen, 2014), and The Political Construction of Business Interests (Cathie Jo Martin and Duane Swank, 2013). There are further reasons to pay particular attention to the Scandinavian, and more specifically the Norwegian cases: (i) They are to varying degrees neo-corporatist societies, characterized by ongoing bargaining over social and political reform processes. From a theoretical perspective this invites reflections which, to some extent, are at odds with the dominant conceptions of institutional change. Neither models of path dependency nor models of aggregate, incremental change focus on the continuous social bargaining over institutional change. (ii) Despite recent processes of liberalization, common to the Western world as a whole, corporatism implies a close connection between state, public sphere, cultural life, and religion. This also means that institutions are closely bundled, in an even stronger way than assumed for example in the Varieties of Capitalism literature. Furthermore, we only have scarce insight in the way the different spheres of corporatism are connected and interact. In the proposed edited volume we have collected historical-institutional case studies from a broad set of social fields (a detailed outline of contents and contributors is attached): • Critical assessments of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of the public sphere • Can the public sphere be considered an institution? • The central position of the public sphere in social and political change in Norway • Digital transformations and effects of the growing PR industry on the public sphere • Institutionalization of social media in local politics and voluntary organizations • Legitimation work in the public sphere • freedom of expression and warning in the workplace • “Return of religion” to the public sphere, and its effects.

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2017). A power elite in the cultural field. A story of Norwegian neo-corporatism. International Journal of Cultural Policy. 23(5), s. 527–544. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2015.1084297. Vis sammendrag

  The organizational culture elite is studied as a new elite group emerging within a stable neo-corporatist state. Does this new elite adopt existing modes of operation or place itself at bay from the more established elite groups? The emergence of and changes in the culture elite are discussed from a historical perspective in terms of social background, recruitment processes, occupational careers, gender composition, political outlooks, lobbying, and media strategies. The culture elite is systematically compared to two other elites: the university elite, the most similar among the elites, and the economic elite, assumedly representing the greatest contrast. Despite special characteristics in the social situations and political views of the culture elite, it is concluded that the mode of operation of this group indicates a high degree of adaptability to the general system of elites. A main reason is assumed to be the integrative power and liberal quality of the state in a neo-corporatist regime.

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2016). CHEF/Leder. I Stene-Johansen, Knut; Refsum, Christian & Schimanski, Johan Henrik (Red.), Å leve sammen. Roland Barthes, individet og fellesskapet. Spartacus. s. 154–166.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2016). Welfare states - India and Scandinavia. Social Rights, Decommodification, Democracy. I Törnquist, Olle & Harriss, John (Red.), Reinventing Social Democratic Development. Insights from Indian and Scandinavian Comparisons. NIAS Press. s. 212–237.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2016). Makt og demokrati. To utkast til samfunnsforståelse. I Frønes, Ivar & Kjølsrød, Lise (Red.), Det norske samfunn, bind 2. Gyldendal Akademisk. s. 87–111.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2015). The enigma of capitalism - Beyond human power II and John Gabriel Borkman. Bjørnstjere Bjørnson and Henrik Ibsen as critics of capitalism. Nordlit. 34, s. 115–127. doi: 10.7557/13.3358.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2015). Offentlighet og strategisk kommunikasjon. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning. s. 387–418.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2015). Conflict, Compromise, Cooperation Concluding Reflections. I Engelstad, Fredrik & Hagelund, Anniken (Red.), Cooperation and Conflict the Nordic Way : Work, Welfare, and Institutional Change in Scandinavia. De Gruyter Open. s. 282–292. doi: 10.1515/9783110436891-016.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2015). Property Rights, Governance, and Power Balances. I Engelstad, Fredrik & Hagelund, Anniken (Red.), Cooperation and Conflict the Nordic Way : Work, Welfare, and Institutional Change in Scandinavia. De Gruyter Open. s. 36–55. doi: 10.1515/9783110436891-004.
• Hagelund, Anniken & Engelstad, Fredrik (2015). Introduction: Institutional Change in Neo- Corporatist Society. I Engelstad, Fredrik & Hagelund, Anniken (Red.), Cooperation and Conflict the Nordic Way : Work, Welfare, and Institutional Change in Scandinavia. De Gruyter Open. s. 1–16. doi: 10.1515/9783110436891-002.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2014). Om forholdet mellom politikk og kunnskap. I Winkelmann, Annette & Johansson, Marit (Red.), Kulturrikets tilstand 2013 : konferanserapport. Telemarksforsking.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2014). Elite compromise, crisis and democracy: The United States, Norway and Italy compared. I Best, Heinrich & Higley, John (Red.), Political elites in the transatlantic crisis. Palgrave Macmillan. s. 138–154. doi: 10.1057/9781137345752_8.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2014). Kronglete stier - lysning i sikte? Argumenter for en ny-weberiansk maktforståelse. I Claes, Dag Harald; Heidar, Knut & Holst, Cathrine (Red.), Politikk i grenseland - Festskrift til Øyvind Østerud. Universitetsforlaget.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2013). Forstillelse og forførelse. Bjørnstjerne Bjørnsons "Èn dag". I Bliksrud, Liv; D'Amico, Giuliano; Wulfsberg, Marius & Åslund, Arnfinn (Red.), Den Engasjerte kosmopolitt : nye Bjørnson-studier. Novus Forlag.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2013). Kunstens makt? Tingenes makt? En refleksjon over virkninger av tekster og bilder. Tidsskrift for kulturforskning. s. 23–38.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2012). Samfunn, demokrati og makt. I Dahlgren, Kenneth & Næss, Hans Erik (Red.), Tanker om samfunn. Universitetsforlaget. s. 130–153.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2012). Likestilling og lønnsomhet: Hva vet vi om økonomiske virkninger av kjønnskvotering til ASA-styrer? Søkelys på arbeidslivet. 29(3), s. 258–274.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2012). Michel Foucault som galskapens arkeolog. I Gilbert, Sidsel Kari; Stänicke, Erik & Engelstad, Fredrik (Red.), Psyke, kultur og samfunn: Perspektiver på indre og ytre virkelighet. Abstrakt forlag. s. 229–246.
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Teigen, Mari (2012). Introduction: Gender and Varieties of Economic Power – The Significance of Family and State. I Engelstad, Fredrik & Teigen, Mari (Red.), Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi: 10.1108/s0195-6310(2012)0000029004.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2012). The sociology of power. I Aakvaag, Gunnar Colbjørnsen; Jacobsen, Michael Hviid & Johansson, Thomas (Red.), Introduction to Sociology. Scandinavian Sensibilities. Prentice-Hall. s. 58–80.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2012). Limits to state intervention into the private sector economy: aspects of property rights in social democratic societies. I Engelstad, Fredrik & Teigen, Mari (Red.), Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. s. 235–265. doi: 10.1108/s0195-6310(2012)0000029012.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2011). The Assignment of Political Office by Lot. I Stone, Peter (Red.), Lotteries in Public Life. A Reader. Imprint Academic. s. 177–200. doi: 10.1177/053901889028001002.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2011). Kan kjønnskvotering i næringslivet forsvares? : en normativ analyse. Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning. 35, s. 120–140.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2010). Henrik Ibsen: The power of charisma. I Edling, Christoffer & Rydgren, Jens (Red.), Sociological insights of great thinkers. Sociology through literature, philosophy, and science. Praeger. s. 95–103.
• Hansen, Marianne Nordli & Engelstad, Fredrik (2010). Samfunnsklasser og eliter. I Frønes, Ivar & Kjølsrød, Lise (Red.), Det norske samfunn. Gyldendal Akademisk. s. 191–213.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2010). Makt - konsentrasjon og fordeling. I Frønes, Ivar & Kjølsrød, Lise (Red.), Det norske samfunn. Gyldendal Akademisk. s. 164–190.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2010). Rom med utsikt. Om å studere samfunnets toppsjikt. I Album, Dag; Hansen, Marianne Nordli & Widerberg, Karin (Red.), Metodene våre. Eksempler fra samfunnsvitenskapelig forskning. Universitetsforlaget. s. 173–188. Vis sammendrag

  Boken presenterer sosiologenes metodearsenal i form av fortellinger fra virkeligheten. Erfarne sosiologer skriver om egne erfaringer. Boken behandler ikke samfunnsvitenskapelig metode i generelle, allmenne, abstrakte termer. Den trekker snarere fram hvordan metoder og metodeutfordringer kommer fram i det konkrete. Forskningsspørsmålene står i sentrum, og det går tydelig fram hvordan metoder er midler til å framskaffe kunnskap, og hvordan bestemte metoder og bruken av dem avgjør hva slags svar eller kunnskap som kan bli produsert. Sammen representerer bidragsyterne et bredt spekter av tema og metodologiske innfallsvinkler.

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). Challenges to democracy: fairness and participation. I Cherkaoui, Mohamed & Hamilton, Peter (Red.), Raymond Boudon: A Life in Sociology. Essays in honour of Raymond Boudon. Bardwell Press. s. 329–346.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). Culture and power. I Clegg, Stewart R. & Haugaard, Mark (Red.), The SAGE Handbook of Power. Sage Publications. s. 210–238.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). Børs og katedral. I Bastiansen, Henrik G.; Hagtvet, Bernt; Hjeltnes, Guri; Lundby, Knut & Rønning, Helge (Red.), Det Elegante uromoment : Hans Fredrik Dahl og offentligheten : festskrift på 70-årsdagen. Pax Forlag. s. 196–210.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). The self-made woman. Om blondiner, kjønn og makt. Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning. 33(3), s. 194–209.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). Democratic elitism - conflict and consensus. Comparative Sociology. 8(3), s. 383–401.
• Griswold, Wendy & Engelstad, Fredrik (2008). State Patronage in Norway and the U.S. I Griswold, Wendy (Red.), Regionalism and the Reading Class. University of Chicago Press. s. 128–159.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2008). Social conventions and the dialectics of recognition: Power and culture in Shakesepare and Ibsen. Journal of Power. 1(2), s. 143–156.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2007). Introduction: Social and Political Elites in Modern Democracies. I Engelstad, Fredrik & Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens (Red.), Comparative Studies of Social and Political Elites. Elsevier. s. 1–9.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2006). Demokratisk kapitalisme - er det mulig? I Engelstad, Fredrik; Lange, Even; Pharo, Helge & Rudeng, Erik (Red.), Demokratisk konservatisme. Pax Forlag.
• Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens & Engelstad, Fredrik (2005). "Elite consensus on the Norwegian welfare state model". West European Politics. 28(4), s. 899–919. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2004). Er det makt i de lyttende ører? Om brutte dialoger og åpne rom. I Frønes, Ivar & Wetlesen, Tone Schou (Red.), Dialog, selv og samfunn. Abstrakt forlag. s. 233–249.
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Østerud, Øyvind (2004). Democracy and Power. I Engelstad, Fredrik & Østerud, Øyvind (Red.), Power and Democracy. Critical Interventions. Ashgate. s. 1–10.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2004). Economic Democracy - Does it Make Sense in the 21st Century? I Engelstad, Fredrik & Østerud, Øyvind (Red.), Power and Democracy. Critical Interventions. Ashgate.
• Hansen, Marianne Nordli & Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). Samfunnsklasser og klasseteorier, Det norske samfunn. s. 154–183.
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Meyer, Siri; Selle, Per; Skjeie, Hege & Østerud, Øyvind (2003). Makt og demokrati. Sluttrapport fra Makt- og demokratiutredningen. NOU - Norges offentlige utredninger. s. 1–100.
• Hansen, Marianne Nordli & Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). Samfunnsklasser og eliter, Det norske samfunn. s. 191–211.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). National Literature, Collective Identity and Political Power. Comparative Social Research. 21, s. 111–145. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). Frihet, adel, livskall. Henrik Ibsen som kritiker av demokratiet. Sosiologi i dag. 33(3), s. 33–49. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Engelstad, Fredrik; Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens; Midtbøen, Arnfinn Haagensen & Teigen, Mari (2022). Eliter i endring : Makt, demokrati, representasjon. Universitetsforlaget. 360 s.
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens; Mangset, Marte & Teigen, Mari (2019). Elites and people: Challenges to democracy. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (2018). Democratic State and Democratic Society. De Gruyter Open. 403 s.
• Byrkjeflot, Haldor & Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). Bureaucracy and Society in Transition: Comparative Perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 308 s.
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Larsen, Håkon; Rogstad, Jon & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (2017). Institutional Change in the Public Sphere: Views on the Nordic Model. De Gruyter Open. 269 s. Vis sammendrag

  The main focus of the book is institutional change in the Scandinavian model, with special emphasis on Norway. There are many reasons to pay closer attention to the Norwegian case when it comes to analyses of changes in the public sphere. In the country’s political history, the arts and the media played a particular role in the processes towards sovereignty at the beginning of the 20th century. On a par with the other Scandinavian countries, Norway is in the forefront in the world in the distribution and uses of Internet technology. As an extreme case, the most corporatist society within the family of the “Nordic Model”, it offers an opportunity both for intriguing case studies and for challenging and refining existing theory on processes of institutional change in media policy and cultural policy. It supplements two recent, important books on political economy in Scandinavia: Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity (Kathleen Thelen, 2014), and The Political Construction of Business Interests (Cathie Jo Martin and Duane Swank, 2013). There are further reasons to pay particular attention to the Scandinavian, and more specifically the Norwegian cases: (i) They are to varying degrees neo-corporatist societies, characterized by ongoing bargaining over social and political reform processes. From a theoretical perspective this invites reflections which, to some extent, are at odds with the dominant conceptions of institutional change. Neither models of path dependency nor models of aggregate, incremental change focus on the continuous social bargaining over institutional change. (ii) Despite recent processes of liberalization, common to the Western world as a whole, corporatism implies a close connection between state, public sphere, cultural life, and religion. This also means that institutions are closely bundled, in an even stronger way than assumed for example in the Varieties of Capitalism literature. Furthermore, we only have scarce insight in the way the different spheres of corporatism are connected and interact. In the proposed edited volume we have collected historical-institutional case studies from a broad set of social fields (a detailed outline of contents and contributors is attached): • Critical assessments of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of the public sphere • Can the public sphere be considered an institution? • The central position of the public sphere in social and political change in Norway • Digital transformations and effects of the growing PR industry on the public sphere • Institutionalization of social media in local politics and voluntary organizations • Legitimation work in the public sphere • freedom of expression and warning in the workplace • “Return of religion” to the public sphere, and its effects.

• Engelstad, Fredrik & Hagelund, Anniken (2015). Cooperation and Conflict the Nordic Way : Work, Welfare, and Institutional Change in Scandinavia. De Gruyter Open. 298 s.
• Gilbert, Sidsel Kari; Stänicke, Erik & Engelstad, Fredrik (2012). Psyke, kultur og samfunn: Perspektiver på indre og ytre virkelighet. Abstrakt forlag. 406 s.
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Teigen, Mari (2012). Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 265 s.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2010). Maktens uttrykk. Kulturforståelse som maktanalyse. Universitetsforlaget. 352 s.
• Kalleberg, Ragnvald; Malnes, Raino Sverre & Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). Samfunnsvitenskapenes oppgaver, arbeidsmåter og grunnlagsproblemer. (Særtrykk av 5 kapitler fra bok publisert i 2005). Gyldendal Akademisk. 150 s.
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens (2007). Comparative Studies of Social and Political Elites. Elsevier. 286 s.
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Lange, Even; Pharo, Helge & Rudeng, Erik (2006). Demokratisk konservatisme. Pax Forlag. 519 s.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2006). Demokratisk konservatisme. Pax Forlag. 519 s.
• Asgeirsdottir, Kristin; Engelstad, Fredrik & Simonsen, Ditte Maja (2005). Demokrati og engagement : paradokser i de nordiske demokratier. Nordisk Råd. 177 s.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2005). Hva er makt. Universitetsforlaget. 158 s.
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Grenness, Carl-Erik; Kalleberg, Ragnvald & Malnes, Raino Sverre (2005). Introduksjon til samfunnsfag. Vitenskapsteori, argumentasjon og faghistorie. Gyldendal Akademisk. 496 s.
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Østerud, Øyvind (2004). Power and Democracy. Critical Interventions. Ashgate. 248 s.
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Ekberg, Espen; Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens & Vatnaland, Jon (2003). Næringslivet mellom marked og politikk. Gyldendal Akademisk. 305 s.
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Ødegård, Guro (2003). Ungdom, makt og mening. Gyldendal Akademisk. 422 s.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). National regimes of collective bargaining in transformation: Nordic trends in a comparative perspective. Makt- og demokratiutredningen.
• Dølvik, Jon Erik & Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). National regimes of collective bargaining in transformation: Nordic trends in a comparative perspective. Makt og demokratiutredningen.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). Olje og Makt. Makt- og demokratiutredningen.
• Østerud, Øyvind; Engelstad, Fredrik; Meyer, Siri; Selle, Per & Skjeie, Hege (2003). Makt og demokrati. Sluttrapport fra Makt- og Demokratiutredningen. Norges offentlige utredninger.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2023). Makten i dyregården (Innledning til teaterstykket "Animal farm" ;Rogaland teater, 2023).
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Thorsen, Dag Einar (2022). makt. Store Norske Leksikon (Nettutgaven).
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2020). Institutt for samfunnsforskning 70 år : Refleksjoner over noen lange linjer. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning. 61(3), s. 273–297. doi: 10.18261/ISSN.1504-291X-2020-03-06. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2019). Makt - et rusmiddel (Innledning til teaterstykket "Pang!"; Rogaland Teater, 2019).
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). Bokessay om: Olav Korsnes, Johan Heilbron, Johs. Hjellbrekke, Felix Bühlmann, Mike Savage (red.): New Directions in Elite Studies. Norsk sosiologisk tidsskrift. 2(5), s. 429–433. doi: 10.18261/issn.2535-2512.
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Larsen, Håkon (2018). The significance of the state for facilitating a civil sphere in Scandinavia.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2017). Demokrati og institusjoner i endring.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2017). Innledning.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2016). Makt, elite, makteliter. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift. 4, s. 340–344.
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Larsen, Håkon (2016). The public sphere in the Nordic model.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2013). Makt. I Godal, Anne Marit (Red.), Store norske leksikon (snl.no). Store norske leksikon AS.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2013). Dag Solhjell og Jon Øien: Det norske kunstfeltet. En sosiologisk innføring. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning. 54(4), s. 511–514.
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Stänicke, Erik & Gilbert, Sidsel Kari (2012). Innledning: Psyke, kultur og samfunn. I Gilbert, Sidsel Kari; Stänicke, Erik & Engelstad, Fredrik (Red.), Psyke, kultur og samfunn: Perspektiver på indre og ytre virkelighet. Abstrakt forlag. s. 9–22.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2011). Bjørnstjerne Bjørnson - samfunnsendring som kunnskapsutvikling. Årbok / Det norske videnskaps-akademi. s. 298–300.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2010). Bjørnstjerne Bjørnson - samfunnsendring som kunnskapsutvikling.
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (2010). Hva er det med hybride organisasjoner? Nordiske organisasjonsstudier. 12(3), s. 3–7.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). Geir Høgsnes in memoriam. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning. s. 283–386.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2006). Demokrati som konflikt - filosofi og politikk hos Chantal Mouffe. Demo. 6(1), s. 45–48.
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2004). Den siste maktutredningen bør ikke bli den siste. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift. 21(1), s. 96–102. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Se alle arbeider i Cristin