The Norwegian National Election Study of 2025 & 2029

• Bergh, Johannes & Hesstvedt, Stine (2026). Kjønnsgap i stemmegivning: En tredje bølge? In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The modern gender gap in voting, in which men are more likely to vote for center-right parties than women and women tend to vote more for center-left parties, reached a new high in Norway in the 2025-election. The gender gap has never been larger in the close to 70-year history of the Norwegian National Election Study. The gap is especially large among young, Generation Z voters. We find that generational replacement contributes to a rise in the gender gap over time. This suggests that the gap may keep rising in the years to come. Though there are differences between men and women in their views on gender roles and gender equality, these attitudes are not the main drives of gender differences in voting. Rather, attitudinal differences regarding economic issues such as taxes and public spending, as well as immigration policy, accounts for much of the gender gap in voting.

• Bergh, Johannes; Hesstvedt, Stine; Karlsen, Rune & Lunde, Therese (2026). Dagsorden og sakseierskap. In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 133–154. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This chapter is about political issues in the 2025 election. The most important issues for Norwegian voters in the election, staring with the most important, were taxes, health care, foreign and defense policy, other economic issues, climate/environmental issues, immigration and education. Foreign policy and defense policy rose dramatically in importance since the last election in 2021. The last time these issues were high on the agenda was in the 1980s. Climate change and environmental issues have dramatically declined in importance, whereas economic issues were top of mind for voters in 2025. The two winners in the election, the Progress Party and the Labor Party, have high levels of issue ownership of economic issues. The Progress Party has gained in issue ownership on a number of issues since the last election, while the Conservative Party has lost.

• Aardal, Bernt; Bergh, Johannes & Hesstvedt, Stine (2026). Ideologi og polarisering. In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 71–108. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The chapter studies the ideological positions of Norwegian voters in connection with the 2025-election. The analyses build on several previous studies from the Norwegian National Election Study that map the ideological political landscape in Norway over time. Norwegian politics is multidimensional. A factor analysis reveals 6 ideological dimensions on which voters hold relatively consistent opinions. They are 1) an economic left-right scale, 2) a climate/ environmental policy scale, 3) an immigration policy scale, 4) a global-national orientation scale, 5) a religious-secular scale and 6) a center-periphery scale. We find evidence of an ideological rightwing shift in the Norwegian electorate from 2021 to 2025; voters are on average moving in the direction of parties on the right on several of these dimensions. We also see evidence of increased ideological polarization in the electorate.

• Hesstvedt, Stine & Langsæther, Peter Egge (2026). Hvem stemte hva? Sosial bakgrunn og stemmegivning ved valget 2025. In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 57–70. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This chapter analyses how social background shaped voting in Norway’s 2025 parliamentary election, examining cleavages of centre-periphery, urban-rural, class, education, age, and gender, with historical comparisons back to 1957. Drawing on Statistics Norway register data (N = 10,747) and the Norwegian Election Study (N = 1,800), the authors find growing polarization along social lines. The most striking finding is a historic gender gap among young voters: roughly 38% of men under 30 voted for The Progress Party (FrP), nearly doubling from 2021, while young women gravitated toward The Socialist Left Party (SV) and The Green Party (MDG). The Labour Party (Ap) has shifted toward an older electorate, drawing 53% of women over 70, but struggles to mobilize youth. The Conservative Party (H) have returned to their upper-middle-class roots, losing young men to FrP. Geographically, The Centre Party (Sp) remains dominant in rural areas while The Conservative Party and smaller liberal/green parties concentrate in the Oslo area. FrP broadened its appeal across regions, age groups, and educational levels, combining gains in core constituencies (young men, lower-educated voters) with

• Bergh, Johannes; Christensen, Dag Arne & Finseraas, Henning (2026). Valgdeltakelse, politikk og mobilisering. In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 375–391. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Voter turnout in the 2025 parliamentary election increased by 2.8 percentage points compared to the previous election, reaching 80 percent – the highest level in any parliamentary election since 1989. Drawing on data from the Norwegian National Election Study, this chapter discusses possible political explanations for this increase. The analysis focuses in particular on voters who did not participate in 2021 but were mobilized in 2025 and compares them with voters who turned out in both elections. There are reasons to believe that intermittent voters have weaker ties to political parties and are more easily mobilized by campaign strategies, the question of government formation, or the political issues that come to the forefront during the campaign. A central question in this chapter is therefore whether there are indications that the issues emphasised during the election campaign contributed to mobilization, and whether this mobilization exhibits ideological or political bias.

• Haugsgjerd, Atle; Karlsen, Rune; Figenschou, Tine Ustad; Ihlebæk, Karoline Andrea & Aalberg, Toril (2026). Does alternative news media inform or misinform voters during election campaigns? New Media & Society. p. 1–21. doi: 10.1177/14614448261473777. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  A growing body of literature has studied the audiences and effects of alternative media use. We contribute by examining how such usage shapes political knowledge during election campaigns. Given their partisan orientation, lack of professional verification, and often provocative style, alternative media are found to produce and circulate misinformation, even as their users are often politically engaged, active news consumers. We ask whether alternative media inform rather than misinform citizens during election campaigns. Adopting a two-dimensional conception of political knowledge, we examine both surveillance knowledge and confidence in that knowledge – along with misinformation understood as the combination of the two. Utilizing individual-level panel data from Norway, our findings suggest that alternative news use is not associated with being better or worse informed, but with being more confident in one’s political knowledge. We discuss how these effects may differ in more polarized or lower-quality information environments.

• Hesstvedt, Stine & Karlsen, Rune (2026). Penger i politikk: Holdninger til pengedonasjoner blant stortingskandidater ved valget i 2025. In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 423–447. doi: https:/cdforskning.no/cdf/catalog/book/296. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Norwegian party finance has traditionally rested on the principle that parties should be funded primarily through generous public subsidies rather than private contributions, limiting the role of external money in politics. The 2025 parliamentary election may mark a break with this model: private donations reached a historic high, and for the first time the right-wing bloc received more than the left. Drawing on the 2025 Storting Candidate Survey, party accounting data, and the 2025 Election Survey, this chapter examines how parliamentary candidates view party donations, regulation, and donor influence. We find pronounced differences along partisan and ideological lines, but also within parties: candidates from parties receiving large contributions – and top candidates in particular – regard donations as beneficial and are less inclined to see them as a democratic problem or to favor stricter regulation. Attitudes thus reflect not only ideology but also position and self-interest. Comparing candidates with voters, we find that right-wing top candidates are notably less concerned about large donations than their own voters. The findings suggest the Norwegian party finance model may be changing, raising new questions about money’s role in Norwegian democracy.

• Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum; Kumlin, Staffan & Linde, Jonas (2026). Politisk tillit under press i Norge? In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 393–421. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This chapter examines how political trust in Norway has developed over time and asks whether recent trends indicate a decline. Using time series from the Norwegian Election Studies, it analyses trust in political institutions and trust in politicians. It also examines differences by generation and gender, as well as winner–loser differences in political trust. The chapter shows that Norway still has high levels of political trust in comparative perspective, but that the overall picture is less stable than before. Trust in political institutions has remained relatively robust since 2005, although it declined from 2021 to 2025. Trust in politicians follows a clearer and more long-term decline, reaching its lowest level in 2025. The analyses also reveal growing differences by generation and gender. Younger cohorts, especially young men, have markedly lower trust in politicians than earlier generations had at the same age. Finally, the winner–loser gap in political trust has historically been small in Norway. In 2025, however, this gap became more pronounced, especially for trust in politicians. The chapter concludes that although Norway is not facing a dramatic trust crisis, several emerging patterns warrant attention.

• Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum; Karlsen, Rune; Martins, Guri Barka & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (2026). Generativ KI i valgkampen 2025: Ny teknologi, etablerte medievaner. In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 281–302. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  How much did generative AI matter in the 2025 Norwegian parliamentary election? This chapter approaches the question from the voters’ perspective, examining who used tools like ChatGPT and Claude during the campaign, what they used them for, and how much they trusted what these tools told them. We then turn from use to perception: how voters considered AI’s influence on themselves and on others, and whether they found it harder to tell true from false in an information environment increasingly shaped by AI-generated content. The results complicates both the optimistic and the alarmist accounts of AI’s arrival in electoral politics. The use of AI was concentrated in particular groups, and AI were used alongside established news sources. Situated at an early stage of generative AI’s integration into election campaigns, the analysis offers a baseline for tracking how this technology may reshape the political information environment in future elections.

• Bergh, Johannes; Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum & Karlsen, Rune (2026). Skiftende preferanser: Velgeroverganger ved stortingsvalget 2025. In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 155–171. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Norwegian voters are less loyal to political parties and more likely to switch vote between elections than in earlier years. In the 2025 parliamentary election, 39 percent of all voters changed their vote from the previous election in 2021 – this includes voters who took part in both elections. The level of volatility is even higher when including those who switched in or out of the “no vote” group: 55 percent. The two winners in the election, the Progress Party and the Labor Party, both won over voters that supported the Center Party in 2021. Young voters and especially young women tend to switch their vote more often than others. Tactical voting played a role in the election, but we see no evidence that it determined the balance of power in Parliament.

• Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (2026). Høyrebølge, men en rødgrønn seier. In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 11–26. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The 2025 Norwegian parliamentary (Storting) election was a win for the governing Labor Party. The five center-left parties barely retained their majority in Stortinget, thus enabling Prime Minister Støre of the Labor Party to continue governing. The election was also a win for the right-wing populist Progress Party, whose support surged to a record high. This book is an in-depth analysis of the election, but also of Norwegian politics and voter behavior, generally. This introduction provides an overview of the outcome of the election and some main trends in Norwegian politics. It also outlines the rest of the book's 21 chapters.

• Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum & Bergh, Johannes (2026). Tilbake på velgernes dagsorden? Utenriks- og sikkerhetspolitikk ved stortingsvalget 2025. In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 237–259. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This chapter examines the role of foreign and security policy in the 2025 Norwegian parliamentary election. It shows that these issues were high on voters’ agenda after several decades of low salience, reflecting a more unsettled geopolitical context. The specific issues that mattered varied between voter groups. The Israel–Palestine conflict was especially important on the left, while defense policy was more prominent among center-right voters. The chapter also shows that conflict patterns differed across issues: support for Ukraine and strengthening the Norwegian defense were marked by broad agreement, whereas attitudes towards Israel and the United States followed clearer left–right divisions. Overall, foreign and security policy had limited independent importance for vote choice when studied as positional issues. However, these issues also mattered through a valence logic, by shaping voters’ assessments of competence, credibility, and governing capacity.

• Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum & Karlsen, Rune (2026). Velgere i møte med gamle og nye medier: Valgkampens informasjonslandskap og politisk kunnskap. In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 189–210. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This chapter examines Norwegian voters’ political media use during the 2025 election campaign and how different forms of media use were related to political knowledge. We find that traditional editorial media remain the core sources of political information, both in terms of daily use and perceived importance. Social media play a more limited role in the electorate as a whole but are important for many young voters, especially as supplementary channels for following political events and actors. The analyses further show that Norwegian voters were relatively well informed after the campaign. Traditional media use is positively associated with political knowledge, while social media use and political use of AI show no clear relationship with either game or substance knowledge. Overall, the chapter shows that the Norwegian campaign information environment is changing, but not disintegrating

• Bergh, Johannes; Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum; Hesstvedt, Stine; Karlsen, Rune & Magin, Melanie (2026). Konflikt og mobilisering: En ny fase i norsk politikk? In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 511–524. doi: 10.23865/cdf.296. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This concluding chapter summarizes the main findings of the book and discusses what explains the outcome of the 2025 Norwegian parliamentary election. The chapter highlights five central explanations: i) an ideological shift to the right, ii) increased voter turnout with partisan consequences, iii) the growing importance of economic concerns, iv) the role of foreign and security policy, and v) the media’s influence on voter’s political priorities. The chapter concludes by discussing what the 2025 election tells us about broader trends in Norwegian politics in the 2020s.

• Geiss, Stefan; Tønnesen, Hedvig; Karlsen, Rune; Magin, Melanie; Aalberg, Toril & Hesstvedt, Stine (2026). Medieeffekter og stemmegivning: Hvordan påvirket mediene velgerne? In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 303–323. doi: 10.23865/cdf.296. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This chapter examines whether the media influenced which issues voters considered important in the 2025 Norwegian parliamentary election, and whether this mattered for vote choice. Drawing on theories of agenda-setting, issue ownership, and priming, the analysis combines panel survey data from the first four waves of the Election Campaign Study with an automated content analysis of approximately 3.5 million sentences from over 200 news outlets, debate programs, social media platforms, search engines, and AI chatbots. The analysis proceeds in two steps. At the aggregate level, the media agenda and the voter agenda show only a moderate correspondence: media emphasized foreign policy issues such as Gaza and Ukraine, while voters prioritized taxation, health, and climate. At the individual level, we construct personalized news diets for each respondent and track the same voters across the campaign. We find clear agenda-setting effects for less obtrusive issues such as the economy, defence, taxation, and foreign policy. A path model further demonstrates a priming effect: media exposure shifts voters’ issue priorities, which in turn shifts vote intention toward parties associated with those issues. Even in a fragmented media landscape, media content meaningfully shaped electoral choice.

• Tønnesen, Hedvig; Geiss, Stefan; Magin, Melanie & Aalberg, Toril (2026). Medievalgkampen 2025 : En studie av dagsorden, partiomtale og politisk balanse. In Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (Ed.), Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. p. 109–132. doi: 10.23865/cdf.296. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This chapter examines media coverage during the Norwegian parliamentary election campaign of 2025, focusing on key issues, party visibility, and political balance across different media types. Based on a large-scale automated content analysis of 538,563 sentences published during the final 12 weeks of the campaign, the election week, and one week afterward, the study compares traditional news media with social media, search engines, and generative AI tools such as ChatGPT as information intermediaries. News coverage was strongly shaped by international developments, particularly the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, alongside domestic issues such as energy policy, the economy, and welfare. In contrast, social media, search engines, and AI tools placed relatively greater emphasis on traditional domestic topics, including welfare, taxation, and health. Despite substantial overlap in the agenda across media types, which suggests limited fragmentation of the public sphere, differences in emphasis may still lead to divergent perceptions among voters depending on their media use. Media attention was highest for the three largest parties Ap, H and FrP, but also the smaller parliamentary parties received significant media attention, while fringe parties remained marginal. Finally, the analysis shows that reporting tended to be more negative than positive across the political blocs. This indicates no strong evidence of systematic political bias in news coverage, but rather reflects common journalistic norms and news values.

• Bergh, Johannes & Aardal, Bernt (2026). The 2025 Norwegian election. West European Politics. 49(5), p. 1370–1382. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2026.2646662. Full text in Research Archive
• Bergh, Johannes & Kleven, Øyvin (2026). Social conservatism and changing party preferences among immigrants in Norway. Politics. p. 1–22. doi: 10.1177/02633957251405201. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The voting patterns of immigrants in Western European countries have for decades tilted towards centre-left parties – a phenomenon referred to as an ‘iron rule’. Evidence from recent elections is suggestive of a breakup of this pattern. Are migrant voters shifting towards parties on the right, and if so, why? We study this question using quality panel survey data from the Norwegian local elections of 2019 and 2023 with uniquely large samples of immigrants, second-generation Norwegians, as well as natives. The 2023 election was a big win for the right. We test whether shifting voter allegiances of voters with immigrant or second-generation backgrounds can be explained by social conservatism and religiosity. Results indicate that social conservatism among religiously active voters is not the main cause of this shift. Rather, pocketbook issues such as taxes are the main driver. The voting patterns of migrants seem to be aligning more with those of native voters, compared to what we have seen in previous studies.

• Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (2025). Voting Behaviour in Norway: Social Structure, Ideology, and Issue Ownership. In Kolltveit, Kristoffer; Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd; Braut-Hegghammer, Målfrid & Rasch, Bjørn Erik (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Norwegian Politics. Oxford University Press. p. 258–282. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This handbook provides a comprehensive examination of Norway’s political institutions, electoral politics, public policymaking, and international relations. As the introductory chapter highlights, Norway is a highly consolidated, homogeneous, corporatist, and consensus-orientated democracy having faced rapid economic growth, significant government access to massive oil revenues, deindustrialization, public-sector expansion, increasing cultural pluralism, and economic inequality, as well as growing party system fragmentation and the decline of the once dominant Social Democratic Party. Each chapter offers foundational knowledge about the present Norwegian system while presenting state-of-the-art overviews of key issues and findings drawn from the most relevant research in their respective fields. Additionally, the chapters provide original analyses of more specialized topics or trace historical developments and overarching trends. The handbook is designed primarily for scholars and students specializing in the covered topics, but it is also intended to serve a secondary readership that includes politicians, journalists, and other individuals interested in gaining a deeper understanding of Norwegian politics. The authors, selected for their in-depth knowledge and expertise as well as their proven track record of publishing research in highly ranked international outlets, offer valuable insights into the different aspects of Norwegian politics. Although the primary focus is on research within political science, contributions from disciplines such as public law, history, and education science are also included. This diverse set of authors brings extensive expertise and presents the chapters in an accessible manner, making this handbook an indispensable resource for understanding Norwegian politics.

• Aardal, Bernt Olav & Bølstad, Jørgen (2025). The Electoral System: Representing Voters and Territory. In Kolltveit, Kristoffer; Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd; Braut-Hegghammer, Målfrid & Rasch, Bjørn Erik (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Norwegian Politics. Oxford University Press. p. 102–119. doi: https:/global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-norwegian-politics-9780198888581?cc=no&lang=en. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The electoral system is a key part of any representative democracy. This chapter starts with an overview of the historical development of the Norwegian electoral system, discussing how competing principles and interests have shaped the system over time. While the system has steadily grown more proportional, it also entails features that are intended to curb excessive fragmentation of the party system by making it harder for small parties to win parliamentary seats. The perhaps most peculiar part of the Norwegian electoral system is its deliberate over-representation of sparsely populated areas – by allocating seats partly based on the geographical size of the electoral districts. The final part of this chapter discusses the electoral system and its consequences in a comparative perspective, examining how the degree of disproportionality and the effective number of parties have developed in Norway compared to other European countries.

• Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum; Linde, Jonas & Mathisen, Ruben Berge (2025). Populist radical right party representation and satisfaction with democracy in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2025.2601295. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This paper examines how political representation of the populist radical right (PRR) in Europe affects citizens’ satisfaction with democracy. Earlier research provides conflicting expectations: Some studies view PRR parties as vehicles of discontent, others as correctives to the waning representational function of mainstream parties. To examine the long-term effects of PRR representation on political support, we apply recent panel-data methods to a dataset on PRR representation and satisfaction with democracy in Europe spanning five decades (1973-2020). The analysis shows that PRR inclusion in government has a positive effect on satisfaction with democracy. Additional individual-level analyses, using 11 rounds of the European Social Survey reveal that the positive net effect of PRR inclusion stems from rising satisfaction not only among PRR voters but also among conservatives and Christian democrats, while having no significant negative impact on most left-leaning voters.

View all works in NVA

• Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (2026). Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Cappelen Damm AS. doi: 10.23865/cdf.296. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Norwegian politics is changing. Voters are ideologically moving towards the right. There is increased polarization. International events such as the wars in the Middle East and in the Ukraine affects Norwegian politics in ways that we have not seen in a long time. Voters’ trust in politicians is falling. Politics has become more serious than Norwegians have been used to in recent decades. At the same time, we also see stronger political engagement and a mobilization of voters who previously stood on the sidelines. The authors of the book analyze trends in Norwegian politics in connection with the 2025 Parliamentary (Storting) election. The Norwegian National Election Studies have a long history, stretching back to the 1957 parliamentary election. Data from this long time-series provide an historic backdrop for the analyses of the 2025-election. Conflict and Mobilization. An Analysis of the 2025 Norwegian Parliamentary Election provides both an introduction to and an updated analysis of Norwegian politics. The authors point in particular to five factors that help explain the outcome of the 2025 election: 1) an ideological shift to the right among voters, 2) the mobilization of previous non-voters who supported the Progress Party, 3) the increased importance of economic issues for voters’ priorities, 4) the strengthened popularity of the incumbent government before the election, not least linked to its handling of foreign and security policy, and 5) a changing media landscape, in which both patterns of media use and media content affect voters’ issue priorities and vote choice.

View all works in NVA

• Bergh, Johannes; Hesstvedt, Stine & Karlsen, Rune (2025). Dagsorden og sakseierskap: Stortingsvalget 2025. Institutt for samfunnsforskning. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in NVA

• Tønnesen, Hedvig; Magin, Melanie & Larsson, Anders Olof (2026). “As Time Goes By”. Assessing Week-by-Week Campaigning Prioritizations Across Social Media Platforms. doi: https:/www.uia.no/om-uia/fakultet/humaniora-og-pedagogikk/arrangementer/kurs-konferanse-seminar/medieforskerkonferansen-2026. Full text in Research Archive
• Bergh, Johannes & Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (2026). Boklansering. Konflikt og mobilisering. En studie av stortingsvalget 2025. Full text in Research Archive
• Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum & Bergh, Johannes (2026). Arendalsuka - Tillitsbarometeret 2026. Full text in Research Archive
• Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (2026). Stoler du på ordføreren? Full text in Research Archive
• Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (2026). Menn mellom 18 og 30 år leder an i mistillit mot politikere. [Journal]. Morgenbladet. Full text in Research Archive
• Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum (2026). Tronskifte, tillitskrise og unge menn. Full text in Research Archive
• Haugsgjerd, Atle Hennum; Linde, Jonas & Mathisen, Ruben Berge (2026). Kan høyrepopulistiske partier gjøre folk mer fornøyde med demokratiet? Full text in Research Archive
• Tønnesen, Hedvig; Larsson, Anders Olof & Magin, Melanie (2026). “As Time Goes By” – Assessing Day-by-Day Campaigning Prioritizations Across Platforms and Elections. doi: https:/c-in.floq.live/event/ecc26/home. Full text in Research Archive
• Saglie, Jo (2025). Tillit til myndighetene. Full text in Research Archive
• Saglie, Jo (2025). Valg 2025. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in NVA