Fredrik Engelstad

• Trygstad, Sissel Charlotte; Ødegård, Anne Mette & Engelstad, Fredrik (2026). Do Institutional Arrangements Matter for a More Friendly Whistleblowing Environment? In Lewis, David; Trygstad, Sissel C. & Vandekerckhove, Wim (Ed.), Whistleblowing and Freedom of Expression in Working Life. Emerald Publishing Limited. p. 49–74. doi: 10.1108/s0195-631020260000038004. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Abstract This chapter investigates how employers and managers protect whistleblowers and assess the impact of whistleblowing on their organisations, drawing on survey data from Denmark, England, Ireland and Norway. All four countries included in this study have legislation protecting whistleblowers. Norway and Denmark belong to so-called inclusive employment regimes, while England and Ireland have more market-based employment regimes. Factors that may contribute to fostering a more whistleblower-friendly environment are identified, and the authors examine how institutional arrangements and employment regimes shape these dynamics. The findings suggest that institutional arrangements and employment regimes play a certain role in promoting environments conducive to whistleblowing, but the findings are not conclusive. However, neither collective agreements nor whistleblowing procedures do affect managerial attitudes towards whistleblowing. This suggests that other factors, beyond institutional frameworks, such as personal experiences and interests, organisational culture or sector-specific dynamics, influence how managers perceive and respond to whistleblowing.1

• Engelstad, Fredrik & Trygstad, Sissel Charlotte (2024). Whistleblowing – an extension of working life democracy? The case of Norway. Economic and Industrial Democracy: an international journal. doi: 10.1177/0143831X241265901. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Working life relations are in a continuous state of change. So are the institutions of working life democracy. In Norway, three well-established components of working life democracy have been in place since the 1960s and 1970s, developing along different institutional tracks: collective bargaining at the national level, employee representation on the boards, and employee participation in protection of health and safety in the work environment. From 2007, legal protection of whistleblowing was included in the Working Environment Act (WEA), anchored in specific institutional arrangements. Before the turn of the century, a common assumption was that whistleblowing mainly targets irregular, even criminal, dispositions of the enterprise. After the inclusion in the WEA, data from Norway from the years 2016 to 2022 demonstrate that to a large extent, psycho-social problems have become the object of whistleblowing. However, institutional specificities limit the handling of social interaction problems by the traditional work environment arrangements. Against the background of its separate institutions for the handling of grievances, it is argued that whistleblowing, along with freedom of expression, are parts of a fourth track of democratization. Even though the institutional setup of whistleblowing has been revised twice since 2007, the findings indicate that additional revisions are still desirable.

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2022). Makt i det norske samfunnet. In Frønes, Ivar & Kjølsrød, Lise (Ed.), Det norske samfunn : bind 2. Gyldendal Akademisk. p. 341–364. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Larsen, Håkon (2019). Nordic civil spheres and pro-civil states. In Alexander, Jeffrey C.; Lund, Anna & Voyer, Andrea (Ed.), The Nordic Civil Sphere. Polity Press. p. 39–63. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The civil sphere is a distinctively democratic field in modern societies, one that sustains universalizing cultural aspirations and organizational structures and that has tense and uncertain boundaries with other spheres of social life, like the economy, religion, family, and state. Unlike the latter, which are more particularistic and hierarchical in character, the civil sphere defines itself in terms of solidarity – the feeling of being connected with every other person in the collectivity. The utopian ideals of democratic solidarity shape every modern society, even if they are often compromised by the messy realities of social life. This volume uses the theory of the civil sphere to shed new light on Nordic societies, while at the same time drawing on the distinctive experiences of the Nordic nations to reflect on and advance the theory of the civil sphere. Nordic societies have long been admired for creating a distinctive form of social democracy, but this admirable achievement has not been well conceptualized theoretically. Most attempts to explain Nordic social democracy focus on material and organizational factors. This volume, by contrast, emphasizes the cultural foundations and characteristics of social democracy, demonstrating how civil sensibilities are necessary for the creation of an egalitarian and democratic state. Nordic civil spheres, however, are not only pro-civil but also white in color, European in ethnicity, secular in character and gender-equal in a subtly restrictive manner. Such primordialization of state civility is vividly on display in the sometime tense relationships that develop among natives and “foreigners” in Nordic countries, relationships that expose the primordial undersides of the social democratic codes and civil values that constitute the Nordic civil sphere. A major contribution to the theory of the civil sphere and to our understanding of the cultural and normative underpinnings of social and political life, this volume will be of particular interest to students and scholars of sociology and politics.

• Engelstad, Fredrik; Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens; Mangset, Marte & Teigen, Mari (2019). Elites and People: Challenges to Democracy. In Engelstad, Fredrik; Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens; Mangset, Marte & Teigen, Mari (Ed.), Elites and people: Challenges to democracy. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. p. 1–13. doi: 10.1108/s0195-631020190000034001. Full text in Research Archive
• Mangset, Marte; Engelstad, Fredrik; Teigen, Mari & Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens (2019). The Populist Elite Paradox: Using Elite Theory to Elucidate the Shapes and Stakes of Populist Elite Critiques. In Engelstad, Fredrik; Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens; Mangset, Marte & Teigen, Mari (Ed.), Elites and people: Challenges to democracy. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. p. 203–222. doi: 10.1108/s0195-631020190000034010. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Critiques of elites define populism, which conceives of power relations as a unified, conspiring elite exploiting the good people. Yet, populism itself is inherently elitist, calling for a strong leader to take power and channel the will of the people. Elite theory, surprisingly overlooked in scholarship on populism, can clarify this apparent paradox and elucidate the dimensions of populism and its risk of authoritarianism in new ways. In contrast to populist ideological conceptions of power relations in society, elite theory points to the possibility that several elites with diverging voices and interests exist. Furthermore, elite theorists argue that such elite pluralism is a necessary component of a well-functioning democracy. Much scholarship on populism, often aiming to understand its causes and focussing on Western Europe and North America, points to the similarities of populist movements. The focus on similarities strengthens the understanding of populism as a uniform phenomenon and populist elite critiques as homogeneous. However, broader comparative studies show that different populist movements target a range of various elite groups. Indeed, the empirical reality of populist elite critiques targeting diverse elite groups is more in line with elite theory than populist ideological conceptions of power relations in society. A key to grasping the democratic challenges posed by the power relations between elites and masses in both populist critiques and populist solutions is an understanding of the institutional conditions for elite integration versus elite pluralism. This central discussion in both classical and modern elite theory is applied to analyse populism in this contribution.

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). Afterword: Institutional Differentiation and Change. In Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (Ed.), Democratic State and Democratic Society. De Gruyter Open. p. 389–400. doi: 10.1515/9783110634082-019. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (2018). Introduction: Democracy, Institutional Compatibility and Change. In Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (Ed.), Democratic State and Democratic Society. De Gruyter Open. p. 1–21. doi: 10.1515/9783110634082-002. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). Models of elite integration. In Best, Heinrich & Higley, John (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 439–457. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_28. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  In this chapter, elites are associated with the possession of decisive political power that gives them disproportionate influence on political and social outcomes. Two opposing views of elite power in democracies are found in the literature. One is of a coalescent power structure or “power elite” and the other is of a pluralistic power structure consisting of elite groups located in diverse economic, governmental, military, media, scientific, and other sectors. The accuracy of these two conflicting views of elite power is treated as an empirical question and takes the pluralist view as the point of departure without, however, ruling out the coalescent view.

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). Elite Compromise as a Mode of Institutional Change: The United States and Norway Compared. In Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (Ed.), Democratic State and Democratic Society. De Gruyter Open. p. 363–388. doi: 10.1515/9783110634082-018. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). Social Institutions and the Quality of Democracy. In Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (Ed.), Democratic State and Democratic Society. De Gruyter Open. p. 22–47. doi: 10.1515/9783110634082-003. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Byrkjeflot, Haldor (2018). Introduction: Bureaucracy in transition. In Byrkjeflot, Haldor & Engelstad, Fredrik (Ed.), Bureaucracy and Society in Transition: Comparative Perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. p. 1–11. doi: 10.1108/s0195-631020180000033005. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). CHEF/Chief. In Stene-Johansen, Knut; Refsum, Christian & Schimanski, Johan (Ed.), Living Together – Roland Barthes, the Individual and the Community. Transcript Verlag. p. 125–134. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2017). A power elite in the cultural field. A story of Norwegian neo-corporatism. International Journal of Cultural Policy. 23(5), p. 527–544. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2015.1084297. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The organizational culture elite is studied as a new elite group emerging within a stable neo-corporatist state. Does this new elite adopt existing modes of operation or place itself at bay from the more established elite groups? The emergence of and changes in the culture elite are discussed from a historical perspective in terms of social background, recruitment processes, occupational careers, gender composition, political outlooks, lobbying, and media strategies. The culture elite is systematically compared to two other elites: the university elite, the most similar among the elites, and the economic elite, assumedly representing the greatest contrast. Despite special characteristics in the social situations and political views of the culture elite, it is concluded that the mode of operation of this group indicates a high degree of adaptability to the general system of elites. A main reason is assumed to be the integrative power and liberal quality of the state in a neo-corporatist regime.

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2017). Strategic Communication and Institutional Change. In Engelstad, Fredrik; Larsen, Håkon; Rogstad, Jon & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (Ed.), Institutional Change in the Public Sphere: Views on the Nordic Model. De Gruyter Open. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The main focus of the book is institutional change in the Scandinavian model, with special emphasis on Norway. There are many reasons to pay closer attention to the Norwegian case when it comes to analyses of changes in the public sphere. In the country’s political history, the arts and the media played a particular role in the processes towards sovereignty at the beginning of the 20th century. On a par with the other Scandinavian countries, Norway is in the forefront in the world in the distribution and uses of Internet technology. As an extreme case, the most corporatist society within the family of the “Nordic Model”, it offers an opportunity both for intriguing case studies and for challenging and refining existing theory on processes of institutional change in media policy and cultural policy. It supplements two recent, important books on political economy in Scandinavia: Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity (Kathleen Thelen, 2014), and The Political Construction of Business Interests (Cathie Jo Martin and Duane Swank, 2013). There are further reasons to pay particular attention to the Scandinavian, and more specifically the Norwegian cases: (i) They are to varying degrees neo-corporatist societies, characterized by ongoing bargaining over social and political reform processes. From a theoretical perspective this invites reflections which, to some extent, are at odds with the dominant conceptions of institutional change. Neither models of path dependency nor models of aggregate, incremental change focus on the continuous social bargaining over institutional change. (ii) Despite recent processes of liberalization, common to the Western world as a whole, corporatism implies a close connection between state, public sphere, cultural life, and religion. This also means that institutions are closely bundled, in an even stronger way than assumed for example in the Varieties of Capitalism literature. Furthermore, we only have scarce insight in the way the different spheres of corporatism are connected and interact. In the proposed edited volume we have collected historical-institutional case studies from a broad set of social fields (a detailed outline of contents and contributors is attached): • Critical assessments of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of the public sphere • Can the public sphere be considered an institution? • The central position of the public sphere in social and political change in Norway • Digital transformations and effects of the growing PR industry on the public sphere • Institutionalization of social media in local politics and voluntary organizations • Legitimation work in the public sphere • freedom of expression and warning in the workplace • “Return of religion” to the public sphere, and its effects.

• Engelstad, Fredrik; Larsen, Håkon; Rogstad, Jon & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (2017). Introduction: The Public Sphere in Change. Institutional Perspectives on Neo-corporatist Society. In Engelstad, Fredrik; Larsen, Håkon; Rogstad, Jon & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (Ed.), Institutional Change in the Public Sphere: Views on the Nordic Model. De Gruyter Open. p. 1–21. doi: 10.1515/9783110546330-002. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The last two decades have seen far-reaching structural transformations in the public sphere. Few topics have attracted more attention, wild guesses, and misinterpretation, than the prospective effects of ongoing changes in information and communication technology. What even the close future will look like, is highly uncertain. Technology, however, is but one element in the broader social processes of change. Its effects on the public sphere emerge in interaction with cultural and institutional patterns, and thereby citizens’ social and political participation. In order to study these transformations three strands of research are brought together in this volume: research on the public sphere, research on institutional change, and research on the Nordic model.

• Engelstad, Fredrik; Larsen, Håkon & Rogstad, Jon (2017). The Public Sphere in the Nordic Model. In Engelstad, Fredrik; Larsen, Håkon; Rogstad, Jon & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (Ed.), Institutional Change in the Public Sphere: Views on the Nordic Model. De Gruyter Open. p. 46–70. doi: 10.1515/9783110546330-004. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Five institutional fields were pinpointed as the main components of a public sphere in the introductory chapter (Engelstad, Larsen, Rogstad & Steen-Johnsen, this volume). They vary significantly in their institutional structure as well as the distribution of power. These variations to a large extent determine how the public sphere as a whole will function. In the present chapter each of the fields are briefly presented, in order to show some of their specificities, while at the same time pointing to their links to politics and political regulation. Even though material from Norway is the most prominent in this book, Norwe-gian society is part of a broader type of social formation. A broader focus on Nordic societies accentuates that the constellation of institutions in one country is not the product of purely random historical processes, but represent more stable institutional clusters. To the degree that there are central commonalities between the Nordic coun-tries also when it comes to the shape of the public sphere, it makes sense to talk of a Nordic model in this respect, not only in the politico-economic sphere, as is most common.There have been and still are controversies over the fruitfulness of the concept of a Nordic model. Hence, the chapter is introduced by a brief discussion of alternative ways of conceiving a ‘model’. Moreover, the discussion is informed by two important works: Comparing Media Systems (Hallin & Mancini, 2004) and The Media Welfare State (Syvertsen, Enli, Mjøs & Moe, 2014). Even though these works are limited to the media field, and thus cover only part of the topic treated here, they give valuable impulses to the understanding of the public sphere as a whole.

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2016). CHEF/Leder. In Stene-Johansen, Knut; Refsum, Christian & Schimanski, Johan Henrik (Ed.), Å leve sammen. Roland Barthes, individet og fellesskapet. Spartacus. p. 154–166. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2016). Welfare states - India and Scandinavia. Social Rights, Decommodification, Democracy. In Törnquist, Olle & Harriss, John (Ed.), Reinventing Social Democratic Development. Insights from Indian and Scandinavian Comparisons. NIAS Press. p. 212–237. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2016). Makt og demokrati. To utkast til samfunnsforståelse. In Frønes, Ivar & Kjølsrød, Lise (Ed.), Det norske samfunn, bind 2. Gyldendal Akademisk. p. 87–111. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2015). The enigma of capitalism - Beyond human power II and John Gabriel Borkman. Bjørnstjere Bjørnson and Henrik Ibsen as critics of capitalism. Nordlit. 34, p. 115–127. doi: 10.7557/13.3358. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2015). Offentlighet og strategisk kommunikasjon. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning (TfS). p. 387–418. Full text in Research Archive
• Hagelund, Anniken & Engelstad, Fredrik (2015). Introduction: Institutional Change in Neo- Corporatist Society. In Engelstad, Fredrik & Hagelund, Anniken (Ed.), Cooperation and Conflict the Nordic Way : Work, Welfare, and Institutional Change in Scandinavia. De Gruyter Open. p. 1–16. doi: 10.1515/9783110436891-002. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2015). Property Rights, Governance, and Power Balances. In Engelstad, Fredrik & Hagelund, Anniken (Ed.), Cooperation and Conflict the Nordic Way : Work, Welfare, and Institutional Change in Scandinavia. De Gruyter Open. p. 36–55. doi: 10.1515/9783110436891-004. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2015). Conflict, Compromise, Cooperation Concluding Reflections. In Engelstad, Fredrik & Hagelund, Anniken (Ed.), Cooperation and Conflict the Nordic Way : Work, Welfare, and Institutional Change in Scandinavia. De Gruyter Open. p. 282–292. doi: 10.1515/9783110436891-016. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2014). Elite compromise, crisis and democracy: The United States, Norway and Italy compared. In Best, Heinrich & Higley, John (Ed.), Political elites in the transatlantic crisis. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 138–154. doi: 10.1057/9781137345752_8. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2014). Kronglete stier - lysning i sikte? Argumenter for en ny-weberiansk maktforståelse. In Claes, Dag Harald; Heidar, Knut & Holst, Cathrine (Ed.), Politikk i grenseland - Festskrift til Øyvind Østerud. Universitetsforlaget. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2014). Om forholdet mellom politikk og kunnskap. In Winkelmann, Annette & Johansson, Marit (Ed.), Kulturrikets tilstand 2013 : konferanserapport. Telemarksforsking. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Konferanserapport for Kulturrikets tilstand 2013. Konferansen ble holdt på Litteraturhuset i Oslo 30. oktober 2013.

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2013). Kunstens makt? Tingenes makt? En refleksjon over virkninger av tekster og bilder. Tidsskrift for kulturforskning. p. 23–38. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2013). Forstillelse og forførelse. Bjørnstjerne Bjørnsons "Èn dag". In Bliksrud, Liv; D'Amico, Giuliano; Wulfsberg, Marius & Åslund, Arnfinn (Ed.), Den Engasjerte kosmopolitt : nye Bjørnson-studier. Novus Forlag. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2012). The sociology of power. In Aakvaag, Gunnar Colbjørnsen; Jacobsen, Michael Hviid & Johansson, Thomas (Ed.), Introduction to Sociology. Scandinavian Sensibilities. Prentice-Hall. p. 58–80. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2012). Limits to state intervention into the private sector economy: aspects of property rights in social democratic societies. In Engelstad, Fredrik & Teigen, Mari (Ed.), Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. p. 235–265. doi: 10.1108/s0195-6310(2012)0000029012. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2012). Samfunn, demokrati og makt. In Dahlgren, Kenneth & Næss, Hans Erik (Ed.), Tanker om samfunn. Universitetsforlaget. p. 130–153. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Teigen, Mari (2012). Introduction: Gender and Varieties of Economic Power – The Significance of Family and State. In Engelstad, Fredrik & Teigen, Mari (Ed.), Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi: 10.1108/s0195-6310(2012)0000029004. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2012). Likestilling og lønnsomhet: Hva vet vi om økonomiske virkninger av kjønnskvotering til ASA-styrer? Søkelys på arbeidslivet. 29(3), p. 258–274. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2012). Michel Foucault som galskapens arkeolog. In Gilbert, Sidsel Kari; Stänicke, Erik & Engelstad, Fredrik (Ed.), Psyke, kultur og samfunn: Perspektiver på indre og ytre virkelighet. Abstrakt forlag. p. 229–246. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2011). Kan kjønnskvotering i næringslivet forsvares? : en normativ analyse. Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning. 35, p. 120–140. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2011). The Assignment of Political Office by Lot. In Stone, Peter (Eds.), Lotteries in Public Life. A Reader. Imprint Academic. p. 177–200. doi: 10.1177/053901889028001002. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2010). Henrik Ibsen: The power of charisma. In Edling, Christoffer & Rydgren, Jens (Ed.), Sociological insights of great thinkers. Sociology through literature, philosophy, and science. Praeger. p. 95–103. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2010). Makt - konsentrasjon og fordeling. In Frønes, Ivar & Kjølsrød, Lise (Ed.), Det norske samfunn. Gyldendal Akademisk. p. 164–190. Full text in Research Archive
• Hansen, Marianne Nordli & Engelstad, Fredrik (2010). Samfunnsklasser og eliter. In Frønes, Ivar & Kjølsrød, Lise (Ed.), Det norske samfunn. Gyldendal Akademisk. p. 191–213. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2010). Rom med utsikt. Om å studere samfunnets toppsjikt. In Album, Dag; Hansen, Marianne Nordli & Widerberg, Karin (Ed.), Metodene våre. Eksempler fra samfunnsvitenskapelig forskning. Universitetsforlaget. p. 173–188. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Boken presenterer sosiologenes metodearsenal i form av fortellinger fra virkeligheten. Erfarne sosiologer skriver om egne erfaringer. Boken behandler ikke samfunnsvitenskapelig metode i generelle, allmenne, abstrakte termer. Den trekker snarere fram hvordan metoder og metodeutfordringer kommer fram i det konkrete. Forskningsspørsmålene står i sentrum, og det går tydelig fram hvordan metoder er midler til å framskaffe kunnskap, og hvordan bestemte metoder og bruken av dem avgjør hva slags svar eller kunnskap som kan bli produsert. Sammen representerer bidragsyterne et bredt spekter av tema og metodologiske innfallsvinkler.

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). Børs og katedral. In Bastiansen, Henrik G.; Hagtvet, Bernt; Hjeltnes, Guri; Lundby, Knut & Rønning, Helge (Ed.), Det Elegante uromoment : Hans Fredrik Dahl og offentligheten : festskrift på 70-årsdagen. Pax Forlag. p. 196–210. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). The self-made woman. Om blondiner, kjønn og makt. Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning. 33(3), p. 194–209. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). Challenges to democracy: fairness and participation. In Cherkaoui, Mohamed & Hamilton, Peter (Ed.), Raymond Boudon: A Life in Sociology. Essays in honour of Raymond Boudon. Bardwell Press. p. 329–346. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). Culture and power. In Clegg, Stewart R. & Haugaard, Mark (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Power. Sage Publications. p. 210–238. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). Democratic elitism - conflict and consensus. Comparative Sociology. 8(3), p. 383–401. Full text in Research Archive
• Griswold, Wendy & Engelstad, Fredrik (2008). State Patronage in Norway and the U.S. In Griswold, Wendy (Eds.), Regionalism and the Reading Class. University of Chicago Press. p. 128–159. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2008). Social conventions and the dialectics of recognition: Power and culture in Shakesepare and Ibsen. Journal of Power. 1(2), p. 143–156. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2007). Introduction: Social and Political Elites in Modern Democracies. In Engelstad, Fredrik & Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens (Ed.), Comparative Studies of Social and Political Elites. Elsevier. p. 1–9. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2006). Demokratisk kapitalisme - er det mulig? In Engelstad, Fredrik; Lange, Even; Pharo, Helge & Rudeng, Erik (Ed.), Demokratisk konservatisme. Pax Forlag. Full text in Research Archive
• Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens & Engelstad, Fredrik (2005). "Elite consensus on the Norwegian welfare state model". West European Politics. 28(4), p. 899–919. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Østerud, Øyvind (2004). Democracy and Power. In Engelstad, Fredrik & Østerud, Øyvind (Ed.), Power and Democracy. Critical Interventions. Ashgate. p. 1–10. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2004). Economic Democracy - Does it Make Sense in the 21st Century? In Engelstad, Fredrik & Østerud, Øyvind (Ed.), Power and Democracy. Critical Interventions. Ashgate. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2004). Er det makt i de lyttende ører? Om brutte dialoger og åpne rom. In Frønes, Ivar & Wetlesen, Tone Schou (Ed.), Dialog, selv og samfunn. Abstrakt forlag. p. 233–249. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Meyer, Siri; Selle, Per; Skjeie, Hege & Østerud, Øyvind (2003). Makt og demokrati. Sluttrapport fra Makt- og demokratiutredningen. NOU - Norges offentlige utredninger. p. 1–100. Full text in Research Archive
• Hansen, Marianne Nordli & Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). Samfunnsklasser og klasseteorier, Det norske samfunn. p. 154–183. Full text in Research Archive
• Hansen, Marianne Nordli & Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). Samfunnsklasser og eliter, Det norske samfunn. p. 191–211. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). National Literature, Collective Identity and Political Power. Comparative Social Research. 21, p. 111–145. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). Frihet, adel, livskall. Henrik Ibsen som kritiker av demokratiet. Sosiologi i dag. 33(3), p. 33–49. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in NVA

• Engelstad, Fredrik; Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens; Midtbøen, Arnfinn Haagensen & Teigen, Mari (2022). Eliter i endring : Makt, demokrati, representasjon. Universitetsforlaget. 360 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens; Mangset, Marte & Teigen, Mari (2019). Elites and people: Challenges to democracy. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (2018). Democratic State and Democratic Society. De Gruyter Open. 403 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Byrkjeflot, Haldor & Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). Bureaucracy and Society in Transition: Comparative Perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 308 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Larsen, Håkon; Rogstad, Jon & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (2017). Institutional Change in the Public Sphere: Views on the Nordic Model. De Gruyter Open. 269 p. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The main focus of the book is institutional change in the Scandinavian model, with special emphasis on Norway. There are many reasons to pay closer attention to the Norwegian case when it comes to analyses of changes in the public sphere. In the country’s political history, the arts and the media played a particular role in the processes towards sovereignty at the beginning of the 20th century. On a par with the other Scandinavian countries, Norway is in the forefront in the world in the distribution and uses of Internet technology. As an extreme case, the most corporatist society within the family of the “Nordic Model”, it offers an opportunity both for intriguing case studies and for challenging and refining existing theory on processes of institutional change in media policy and cultural policy. It supplements two recent, important books on political economy in Scandinavia: Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity (Kathleen Thelen, 2014), and The Political Construction of Business Interests (Cathie Jo Martin and Duane Swank, 2013). There are further reasons to pay particular attention to the Scandinavian, and more specifically the Norwegian cases: (i) They are to varying degrees neo-corporatist societies, characterized by ongoing bargaining over social and political reform processes. From a theoretical perspective this invites reflections which, to some extent, are at odds with the dominant conceptions of institutional change. Neither models of path dependency nor models of aggregate, incremental change focus on the continuous social bargaining over institutional change. (ii) Despite recent processes of liberalization, common to the Western world as a whole, corporatism implies a close connection between state, public sphere, cultural life, and religion. This also means that institutions are closely bundled, in an even stronger way than assumed for example in the Varieties of Capitalism literature. Furthermore, we only have scarce insight in the way the different spheres of corporatism are connected and interact. In the proposed edited volume we have collected historical-institutional case studies from a broad set of social fields (a detailed outline of contents and contributors is attached): • Critical assessments of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of the public sphere • Can the public sphere be considered an institution? • The central position of the public sphere in social and political change in Norway • Digital transformations and effects of the growing PR industry on the public sphere • Institutionalization of social media in local politics and voluntary organizations • Legitimation work in the public sphere • freedom of expression and warning in the workplace • “Return of religion” to the public sphere, and its effects.

• Engelstad, Fredrik & Hagelund, Anniken (2015). Cooperation and Conflict the Nordic Way : Work, Welfare, and Institutional Change in Scandinavia. De Gruyter Open. 298 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Gilbert, Sidsel Kari; Stänicke, Erik & Engelstad, Fredrik (2012). Psyke, kultur og samfunn: Perspektiver på indre og ytre virkelighet. Abstrakt forlag. 406 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Teigen, Mari (2012). Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 265 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2010). Maktens uttrykk. Kulturforståelse som maktanalyse. Universitetsforlaget. 352 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Kalleberg, Ragnvald; Malnes, Raino Sverre & Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). Samfunnsvitenskapenes oppgaver, arbeidsmåter og grunnlagsproblemer. (Særtrykk av 5 kapitler fra bok publisert i 2005). Gyldendal Akademisk. 150 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens (2007). Comparative Studies of Social and Political Elites. Elsevier. 286 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2006). Demokratisk konservatisme. Pax Forlag. 519 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Lange, Even; Pharo, Helge & Rudeng, Erik (2006). Demokratisk konservatisme. Pax Forlag. 519 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Asgeirsdottir, Kristin; Engelstad, Fredrik & Simonsen, Ditte Maja (2005). Demokrati og engagement : paradokser i de nordiske demokratier. Nordisk Råd. 177 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2005). Hva er makt. Universitetsforlaget. 158 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Grenness, Carl-Erik; Kalleberg, Ragnvald & Malnes, Raino Sverre (2005). Introduksjon til samfunnsfag. Vitenskapsteori, argumentasjon og faghistorie. Gyldendal Akademisk. 496 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Østerud, Øyvind (2004). Power and Democracy. Critical Interventions. Ashgate. 248 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Ekberg, Espen; Gulbrandsen, Trygve Jens & Vatnaland, Jon (2003). Næringslivet mellom marked og politikk. Gyldendal Akademisk. 305 p. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Ødegård, Guro (2003). Ungdom, makt og mening. Gyldendal Akademisk. 422 p. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in NVA

• Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). National regimes of collective bargaining in transformation: Nordic trends in a comparative perspective. Makt- og demokratiutredningen. Full text in Research Archive
• Dølvik, Jon Erik & Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). National regimes of collective bargaining in transformation: Nordic trends in a comparative perspective. Makt og demokratiutredningen. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2003). Olje og Makt. Makt- og demokratiutredningen. Full text in Research Archive
• Østerud, Øyvind; Engelstad, Fredrik; Meyer, Siri; Selle, Per & Skjeie, Hege (2003). Makt og demokrati. Sluttrapport fra Makt- og Demokratiutredningen. Norges offentlige utredninger. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in NVA

• Engelstad, Fredrik & Thorsen, Dag Einar (2022). makt. Store Norske Leksikon (Nettutgaven). Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2020). Institutt for samfunnsforskning 70 år : Refleksjoner over noen lange linjer. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning (TfS). 61(3), p. 273–297. doi: 10.18261/ISSN.1504-291X-2020-03-06. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Larsen, Håkon (2018). The significance of the state for facilitating a civil sphere in Scandinavia. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2018). Bokessay om: Olav Korsnes, Johan Heilbron, Johs. Hjellbrekke, Felix Bühlmann, Mike Savage (red.): New Directions in Elite Studies. Norsk sosiologisk tidsskrift. 2(5), p. 429–433. doi: 10.18261/issn.2535-2512. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2017). Demokrati og institusjoner i endring. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2017). Innledning. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2016). Makt, elite, makteliter. 4, p. 340–344. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Larsen, Håkon (2016). The public sphere in the Nordic model. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2013). Dag Solhjell og Jon Øien: Det norske kunstfeltet. En sosiologisk innføring. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning (TfS). 54(4), p. 511–514. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2013). Makt. In Godal, Anne Marit (Eds.), Store norske leksikon (snl.no). Store norske leksikon AS. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Stänicke, Erik & Gilbert, Sidsel Kari (2012). Innledning: Psyke, kultur og samfunn. In Gilbert, Sidsel Kari; Stänicke, Erik & Engelstad, Fredrik (Ed.), Psyke, kultur og samfunn: Perspektiver på indre og ytre virkelighet. Abstrakt forlag. p. 9–22. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2011). Bjørnstjerne Bjørnson - samfunnsendring som kunnskapsutvikling. Årbok / Det norske videnskaps-akademi. p. 298–300. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2010). Bjørnstjerne Bjørnson - samfunnsendring som kunnskapsutvikling. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik & Steen-Johnsen, Kari (2010). Hva er det med hybride organisasjoner? Nordiske organisasjonsstudier. 12(3), p. 3–7. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2009). Geir Høgsnes in memoriam. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning (TfS). p. 283–386. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2006). Demokrati som konflikt - filosofi og politikk hos Chantal Mouffe. Demo. 6(1), p. 45–48. Full text in Research Archive
• Engelstad, Fredrik (2004). Den siste maktutredningen bør ikke bli den siste. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift (NNT). 21(1), p. 96–102. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in NVA