English
version of this page
Avsluttet prosjekt
Media Impact in the Public Service Sector
Hvordan virker mediepress og mediedekning inn på praksiser, rutiner og prioriteringer i sentralforvaltningen (departementer og direktorater)?
Illustrasjon: Colourbox.com/ISF.
Prosjektbakgrunn
Til tross for den omfattende mediedekningen av velferdssektoren, er det med noen få unntak forsket svært lite på hvordan mediepress kan påvirke de interne prosessene i departementer og underliggende etater. For å øke forståelsen av samspillet mellom forvaltning og medier har vi i dette prosjektet studert forvaltningens mediearbeid i praksis gjennom feltarbeid, dybdeintervjuer, dokumentanalyse og spørreundersøkelser (i Norge og Nederland).
Prosjekttilnærming
Media impact in the public service sector (MIPS) undersøkte hvordan mediepress og mediedekning virker inn på praksiser, rutiner og prioriteringer i sentralforvaltningen (departementer og direktorater). Prosjektet kartla i hvilken grad departementer og direktorater tar opp i seg og bruker nyhetsmedienes logikk, fra nyhetenes fortellinger, formater og rytme, til mer grunnleggende endringer av institusjonell praksis og beslutningsprosesser.
Prosjektet har vært tverrfaglig (statsvitenskap og medievitenskap) og internasjonalt (forskere fra Norge, Nederland, Danmark og Tyskland). Det var finansiert gjennom Norges Forskningsråds VAM-program (2014-2017) og ledet av professor Tine Ustad Figenschou (OsloMet).
Sluttrapport
Media
Presentasjoner
Forskernes innlegg fra sluttseminaret 6. april:
Deltakere
Publikasjoner
-
-
Karlsen, Rune; Kolltveit, Kristoffer; Schillemans, Thomas & Thorbjørnsrud, Kjersti
(2020).
Media and Bureaucracy: Investigating Media Awareness Amongst Civil Servants.
Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration (SPJA).
24(3),
s. 53–72.
doi:
10.58235/sjpa.v24i3.8602.
Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad; Fredriksson, Magnus; Pallas, Josef & Houlberg Salomonsen, Heidi
(2020).
Under the influence of politics: Mediatisation and politico-administrative systems in Scandinavia.
Nordic Journal of Media Studies.
2(1),
s. 85–96.
doi:
10.2478/njms-2020-0008.
Vis sammendrag
This conceptual article extends three ongoing scholarly debates on the mediatisation of politics – the risk of media centrism, the tendency to see mediatisation as a linear process, and the preoccupation with elected officials. We argue for the need to identify, foreground, and systematise non-media dimensions of mediatisation processes. We also argue that actors encounter mediatisation as a set of dynamic ideas rather than a fixed logic. With a focus on government agencies and a comparison of the politico-administrative systems in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, this article gives certain attention to politicisation, autonomy, and accountability and suggests that the degree of freedom granted to agencies in Denmark and Norway is relatively limited compared with agencies in Sweden. Consequently, we present two propositions: 1) agencies in Denmark and Norway are less inclined to mediatise, whereas 2) Swedish government agencies will more likely mediatise and show conformity with widely accepted norms regarding media.
-
-
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad; Karlsen, Rune; Kolltveit, Kristoffer & Thorbjørnsrud, Kjersti
(2017).
Serving the Media Ministers: A Mixed Methods Study on the Personalization of Ministerial Communication.
The International Journal of Press/Politics.
22(4),
s. 411–430.
doi:
10.1177/1940161217720772.
Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
Vis sammendrag
The personalization of politics has received much attention in both the political science and political communication literature, but the focus has almost entirely been on party leaders and prime ministers. This study investigates the personalization of ministerial communication in Norway, a type of decentralized personalization. It combines a survey of communication workers; in-depth interviews with politicians, communication workers, political reporters, and top-level civil servants; and ethnographic observation inside a ministry. The article goes beyond media-centered perspectives and identifies several potential drivers and barriers to personalization processes. Based on our mixed methods approach, we find that ministerial communication in Norway is strongly centered on the minister in both reactive media management and the proactive promotion of the minister and new policies. This decentralized personalization is driven by both demands from the media and the strategic adaptation by political and administrative actors within ministries. Based on the rich empirically grounded insights, the article discusses how the interplay between the logic of the contemporary commercial news media, political ambitions, internal administrative ambitions, and changes in executive government shapes the personalization of ministerial communication, and illuminates how these multiple drivers of personalization are mutually reinforcing.
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad
(2017).
Patient narratives: Health journalists’ reflections, dilemmas and criticism of a compelling journalistic tool.
I Fonn, Birgitte Kjos; Hornmoen, Harald; Hyde-Clarke, Nathalie & Hågvar, Yngve Benestad (Red.),
Putting a Face on it: Individual Exposure and Subjectivity in Journalism.
Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
s. 235–256.
doi:
10.23865/noasp.28.
Se alle arbeider i Cristin
-
Karlsen, Rune; Kolltveit, Kristoffer & Stoltenberg, Christina Hoelgaard
(2018).
Mediepåvirkning i offentlig sektor : Resultat- og dokumentasjonsrapport.
Institutt for samfunnsforskning.
Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
Vis sammendrag
Rapporten dokumenterer og gjengir hovedfunnene fra spørreundersøkelsene om mediepåvirkning sendt ut til ledere, saksbehandlere og kommunikasjonsansatte i departementene, og i direktorater, ombud og tilsyn høsten 2015 og våren 2016.
Se alle arbeider i Cristin
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad; Fredriksson, Magnus; Kolltveit, Kristoffer & Pallas, Josef
(2021).
Public Bureaucracies.
I Skogerbø, Eli; Ihlen, Øyvind; Kristensen, Nete Nørgaard & Nord, Lars W. (Red.),
Power, communication, and politics in the Nordic countries.
Nordicom.
s. 325–345.
doi:
%2010.48335/9789188855299-16.
-
Kolltveit, Kristoffer; Karlsen, Rune & Figenschou, Tine Ustad
(2020).
Conceptualizing Communication Professionals in Public Bureaucracies: Ideal Types and Empirical Application.
-
Kolltveit, Kristoffer; Figenschou, Tine Ustad & Karlsen, Rune
(2018).
Communication workers in ministries: Strategic links between politics and administration.
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad
(2018).
Sluttrapport for forskningsprosjektet Media Impact in the Public Service Sector (2014-2018).
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad
(2018).
Sosialt byråkrati? Kommunikasjon i et hybrid medielandskap .
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad
(2018).
Den haltende valsen: Kilder og journalister i et medielandskap i sterk endring, .
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad
(2017).
Public sector communications and NGOs.
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad
(2017).
Sosial byråkrati? Innovasjon, prøving og feiling.
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad & Thorbjørnsrud, Kjersti
(2017).
Social bureucracies? Government communication beyond the news logic.
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad; Karlsen, Rune; Kolltveit, Kristoffer & Thorbjørnsrud, Kjersti
(2017).
Media influence on bureaucratic decision-making: Evidence from Norway and the Netherlands.
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad; Fredriksson, Magnus; Pallas, Josef & Houlberg, Heidi
(2017).
Mediatization in translation – the Nordic experience.
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad & Thorbjørnsrud, Kjersti
(2017).
Sosialt byråkrati?
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad & Thorbjørnsrud, Kjersti
(2017).
Helsebyråkratiets bevisste bruk av media.
-
Figenschou, Tine Ustad & Thorbjørnsrud, Kjersti
(2017).
Dual Personalization: Government communication in an emotional media landscape.
Se alle arbeider i Cristin
Emneord:
Medier og offentlighet,
Valg og demokrati
Publisert 2. sep. 2014 15:53
- Sist endret 26. feb. 2024 13:34