Norwegian version of this page
Ongoing project

Deporting foreigners: Contested norms in international practice (NORMS)

The project identifies the norms that determine (non-)deportability and theorises the scoping conditions under which they are promoted and contested.

Project period August 2021–December 2024
Project nr. 10483 / NFR: 314300
Project leader Erlend Paasche

NORMS explores international norms in deportation. Including both host and origin state perspectives, the project undertakes a comparative analysis of Norway, Sweden, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia and Ethiopia.

Project Background

Deportation of irregular migrants and rejected asylum seekers is widely known to pit host states against these migrants, but deportation also pits host states against these migrants’ origin states.

Liberal European host states cannot unilaterally send migrants back to the origin state they come from. They depend on the origin state’s political willingness to readmit these migrants, and they depend on its practical assistance with identification and travel documents.

Without this kind of cooperation with origin states, immigration law may not be enforceable. Yet origin states have political, economic and cultural reasons not to collaborate. This partly explains why relatively few—less than half—of Europe’s unauthorised migrants are deported.

Conceptualising this as a conflict of interests, legal scholars and political scientists have focused on the incentives and coercion used by the host state to elicit the rational compliance of the origin state.

Project Aim

NORMS takes a path less trodden and trail-blazes an exploration of social norms in this field. We look at how state agents from host and origin states alike seek to legitimise or de-legitimise deportation, promoting competing norms in a contested policy field.

Research questions

  1. How do host and origin state agents involved with deportation normatively understand it?
  2. To which extent, how and under which conditions do these state agents engage in norm entrepreneurship to legitimise or delegitimise deportation?
  3. How do national norms of deportation evolve?
  4. To which extent and how do norms of deportation clash within the EU border agency Frontex?

Project Approach

We take a practice-oriented and cross-country comparative approach to these norm dynamics. The comparative design includes one host state with high deportation rates (Norway) and one with low deportation rates (Sweden), as well as four unconsolidated states of origin (Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia and Ethiopia).

Moreover, NORMS also examines norm dynamics at the supranational level, as narrated by Norwegian and Swedish police officers who have participated in return operations carried out by the EU agency Frontex.

The project identifies the norms that determine (non-)deportability and theorises the scoping conditions under which they are promoted and contested.

Participants

ParticipantDegree PhoneE-mail
Jan-Paul Brekke Research Director, Equality, inclusion, migration Dr. polit. +47 918 79 903 jan.p.brekke@samfunnsforskning.no
Erlend Paasche Senior Research Fellow PhD +47 474 01 216 erlend.paasche@samfunnsforskning.no
Mathias Hatleskog Tjønn PhD Fellow Master +47 906 13 918 m.h.tjonn@samfunnsforskning.no
Grete Brochmann (Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo)
Tefera Negash Gebregziabher (International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam)
Wil Hout (International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam)
Asnake Kefale (Forum for Social Studies)
Nicole Ostrand ARENA Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo)

Publications

  • Ostrand, Nicole Marie (2023). Cracks in the UK borderscape imaginary: opportunism, fluidity, and contradictions in implementing migration controls abroad. In Le Louvier, Kahina & Hough, Karen Latrice (Ed.), UK Borderscapes: Sites of Enforcement and Resistance. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003350255-11.

View all works in Cristin

  • Ostrand, Nicole Marie (2023). Cracks in the UK imaginary of the strong and effective overseas border: disconnect, opportunism and flexibility in implementation. Border Criminologies Blog.
  • Ostrand, Nicole Marie (2023). the legitimising role of fundamental rights and forced return monitoring in deportations.
  • Ostrand, Nicole Marie (2023). Bottom up relational dynamics in European deportation norms: the relationship between forced return monitors and deportation escort officers.
  • Ostrand, Nicole Marie (2023). Cracks in the borderscape imaginary: Opportunism, fluidity, and contradictions in implementing migration controls abroad.
  • Ostrand, Nicole Marie (2023). Finding common ground? Transnational spaces of negotiation, coproduction and resistance in deportation practices and norms in Europe.
  • Paasche, Erlend (2023). Impact of cash incentives for reintegration assistance.
  • Paasche, Erlend (2023). UTENRIKS Roundtable discussion.
  • Paasche, Erlend (2023). NORMS presentation.
  • Paasche, Erlend (2023). Section, PRA442 workshop. Return and Readmission: A Normative Approach. .
  • Paasche, Erlend (2023). What is sustainable reintegration?
  • Ostrand, Nicole Marie (2023). Moral border work? The role of the Frontex Fundamental Rights Officer and forced return monitors in legitimising deportation practices and norms.
  • Slangsvold, Einar Lie; Paszkiewicz, Zofia; Tjønn, Mathias Hatleskog & Sæther, Steinar Andreas (2023). Studio 2 - Drømmen om Europa: Historien om migrasjon. [Radio]. NRK P2.
  • Paasche, Erlend (2022). Co-organized, presented at and moderated three high level panels at EU workshop on return.
  • Paasche, Erlend (2022). Presented at UDI/IOM Embassy Seminar, on the relationship between integration and reintegration. Participated in panel debate.
  • Paasche, Erlend; Brekke, Jan-Paul & Brochmann, Grete (2022). Europeisk dobbeltmoral. Dag og Tid.
  • Brekke, Jan-Paul (2022). Vesentlig færre flyktninger til Norge: – «Hvorfor velger de ikke oss?». TV2.no.
  • Brekke, Jan-Paul (2022). Ekspert mener flyktningstrømmen til Norge kan være i ferd å nå toppen. TV2.no.
  • Brekke, Jan-Paul (2022). Mener flyktningstrømmen skiller seg fra tidligere: – Det er litt spesielt denne gangen. TV2.no.
  • Brekke, Jan-Paul (2022). Lang større vilje til å bosette flyktninger nå enn i 2015. NRK.no.
  • Brekke, Jan-Paul (2022). Flere positive til innvandring, flere skeptiske til integrering. Utrop - Norges første flerkulturelle avis.
  • Brekke, Jan-Paul (2022). Dagsnytt 18. NRK P1 og P2.
  • Brekke, Jan-Paul (2022). Temakveld med Jan-Paul Brekke.
  • Brekke, Jan-Paul (2022). Integreringskonferansen 2022.
  • Brekke, Jan-Paul (2022). Nordisk konferanse om sivilsamfunn og integrering.
  • Brochmann, Grete (2022). Tojes time: Grete Brochmann. Minervanett.
  • Brochmann, Grete (2022). NAV-konferansen 2021: La oss snakke om tillit.
  • Brochmann, Grete (2022). Disse vant priser under Vinterseminaret 2022. sosiologen.no.
  • Brekke, Jan-Paul & Fladmoe, Audun (2022). Hva mener folk i Norge egentlig om innvandring og integrering? Ny rapport gir svar. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.).
  • Brekke, Jan-Paul (2022). Vi står overfor en masseutflukt. Hvordan bør Norge håndtere den? Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.).
  • Tjønn, Mathias Hatleskog & Akal, Ayse Bala (2022). Rerouting Europe-bound refugees to the Global South ignores their human rights. Peace News.
  • Paasche, Erlend (2021). Embassy seminar on return, keynote speech.
  • Brekke, Jan-Paul (2021). Flukt og asyl – dette er regjeringspartiene uenige om. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.).
  • Paasche, Erlend (2021). PU Ledersamling i ID-enheten, innleder.
  • Paasche, Erlend (2021). Faglunsj i Justisdepartementet, innleder.
  • Paasche, Erlend (2020). CMI/UiB workshop on project development in migration studies, keynote speech.
  • Paasche, Erlend (2020). Norm Conflicts in International Return Practice, keynote speech.

View all works in Cristin

Tags: Migration and integration
Published May 5, 2021 2:18 PM - Last modified Feb. 23, 2024 8:59 AM