Media impact in the public service sector
Changes in practices, processes and resource allocation in the goverment of welfare.
This project examines how a conflict-oriented, tabloid and dramatic news logic influences public welfare policies and administrative practices. News stories related to health and welfare are often emotional and critical. Online journalism, social media and 24/7 news cycles have intensified media pressure, demanding instant responses from affected stakeholders and propelling the development of sophisticated media strategies within public organizations.
In spite of the prominent role of the media in the debates over public welfare, the knowledge, both within media studies and in political science, is sparse regarding how the media affect the internal processes in ministries and agencies. Addressing this knowledge gap the project asks:
- How does media coverage influence the allocation of public welfare resources?
- How is the interplay between political leadership and public administration affected by a news logic?
- How should government respond to media pressure on welfare issues and how can media-related practices improve?
- How are fundamental values (fairness, solidarity and equality) of the welfare state challenged by the media and how can these processes be theorized?
The project contributes to the international research front by linking mediatization theory with theories on changes in public administration and welfare policies. Through the combination of qualitative ethnographic methods with extensive survey studies, the MIPS project contributes to a broader and deeper understanding of what is at stake should the public service increasingly adapt their structures and processes to media pressure.
Examining the normative implications and exploring alternatives to present media management, the MIPS team engages stakeholders within the public sector to critically evaluate the implications of current pr
- Tine Ustad Figenschou (2017). Patient narratives: Health journalists’ reflections, dilemmas and criticism of a compelling journalistic tool, In Harald Hornmoen; Nathalie Hyde-Clarke; Birgitte Kjos Fonn & Yngve Benestad Hågvar (ed.), Putting a Face on it: Individual Exposure and Subjectivity in Journalism. Cappelen Damm Akademisk. ISBN 978-82-02-52214-8. Chapter 10. s 235 - 256
- Tine Ustad Figenschou; Rune Karlsen; Kristoffer Kolltveit & Kjersti Thorbjørnsrud (2017). Serving the Media Ministers: A Mixed Methods Study on the Personalization of Ministerial Communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 22, s 411- 430
- Rune Karlsen; Kristoffer Kolltveit & Christina Hoelgaard Stoltenberg (2018). Mediepåvirkning i offentlig sektor : Resultat- og dokumentasjonsrapport. Rapport – Institutt for samfunnsforskning. 2018:3.
- Tine Ustad Figenschou & Kjersti Thorbjørnsrud (2017). Sosialt byråkrati?.
- Tine Ustad Figenschou & Kjersti Thorbjørnsrud (2017). Helsebyråkratiets bevisste bruk av media.
- Tine Ustad Figenschou & Kjersti Thorbjørnsrud (2017). Dual Personalization: Government communication in an emotional media landscape.
- Tine Ustad Figenschou; Magnus Fredriksson; Josef Pallas & Heidi Houlberg (2017). Mediatization in translation – the Nordic experience.
- Tine Ustad Figenschou (2017). Sosial byråkrati? Innovasjon, prøving og feiling.
- Tine Ustad Figenschou (2017). Public sector communications and NGOs.
- Tine Ustad Figenschou; Rune Karlsen; Kristoffer Kolltveit & Kjersti Thorbjørnsrud (2017). Media influence on bureaucratic decision-making: Evidence from Norway and the Netherlands.
- Tine Ustad Figenschou & Kjersti Thorbjørnsrud (2017). Social bureucracies? Government communication beyond the news logic.