Norwegian version of this page
Ongoing project

Deporting foreigners: Contested norms in international practice (NORMS)

The project identifies the norms that determine (non-)deportability and theorises the scoping conditions under which they are promoted and contested.

Project period August 2021 - December 2024
Project nr. 10483 / NFR: 314300
Project leader Erlend Paasche

NORMS explores international norms in deportation. Including both host and origin state perspectives, the project undertakes a comparative analysis of Norway, Sweden, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia and Ethiopia.

Project Background

Deportation of irregular migrants and rejected asylum seekers is widely known to pit host states against these migrants, but deportation also pits host states against these migrants’ origin states.

Liberal European host states cannot unilaterally send migrants back to the origin state they come from. They depend on the origin state’s political willingness to readmit these migrants, and they depend on its practical assistance with identification and travel documents.

Without this kind of cooperation with origin states, immigration law may not be enforceable. Yet origin states have political, economic and cultural reasons not to collaborate. This partly explains why relatively few—less than half—of Europe’s unauthorised migrants are deported.

Conceptualising this as a conflict of interests, legal scholars and political scientists have focused on the incentives and coercion used by the host state to elicit the rational compliance of the origin state.

Project Aim

NORMS takes a path less trodden and trail-blazes an exploration of social norms in this field. We look at how state agents from host and origin states alike seek to legitimise or de-legitimise deportation, promoting competing norms in a contested policy field.

Research questions

  1. How do host and origin state agents involved with deportation normatively understand it?
  2. To which extent, how and under which conditions do these state agents engage in norm entrepreneurship to legitimise or delegitimise deportation?
  3. How do national norms of deportation evolve?
  4. To which extent and how do norms of deportation clash within the EU border agency Frontex?

Project Approach

We take a practice-oriented and cross-country comparative approach to these norm dynamics. The comparative design includes one host state with high deportation rates (Norway) and one with low deportation rates (Sweden), as well as four unconsolidated states of origin (Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia and Ethiopia).

Moreover, NORMS also examines norm dynamics at the supranational level, as narrated by Norwegian and Swedish police officers who have participated in return operations carried out by the EU agency Frontex.

The project identifies the norms that determine (non-)deportability and theorises the scoping conditions under which they are promoted and contested.

Participants

ParticipantDegree PhoneE-mail
Erlend Paasche (ISF)
Jan-Paul Brekke (ISF)
Grete Brochmann (Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo)
Tefera Negash Gebregziabher (International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam)
Wil Hout (International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam)
Asnake Kefale (Forum for Social Studies)
Post-doctoral researcher (TBI, ARENA Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo)
Doctoral researcher (TBI)
Tags: Migration
Published May 5, 2021 2:18 PM - Last modified May 11, 2021 10:39 AM